- From: Scott Cantor <cantor.2@osu.edu>
- Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 15:23:53 -0400
- To: <edsimon@xmlsec.com>, "'Frederick Hirsch'" <frederick.hirsch@nokia.com>
- Cc: "'XMLSec WG Public List'" <public-xmlsec@w3.org>
Ed Simon wrote on 2009-09-18: > No, I do not have the level of understanding I would need. Beginning to > get that level will require some discussion during our next telecon. I think I could write the text, but I need to know what part of c14n 1.1 is throwing this off. I definitely agree about that misplaced comma and being clear that arbitrary node sets != well-formed XML subtrees. Other than that, I was led to believe that any time you get a node set, you do each node one after the other and that's that. They just get concatenated, I think. The other issue I think you had was that the examples didn't include any of the nasty stuff. Probably true, but would take some work to fix, and since we aren't expecting to produce a new version of c14n 1.x at this point, is that in scope to do? -- Scott
Received on Friday, 18 September 2009 19:32:49 UTC