- From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 23:24:44 +0200
- To: Frederick Hirsch <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>
- Cc: Pratik Datta <pratik.datta@oracle.com>, XMLSec WG Public List <public-xmlsec@w3.org>
On 21 Oct 2009, at 23:18, Frederick Hirsch wrote: > instead of experimental why not xmldsig2, so we don't have to change > it later. experimental is not very meaningful > > e.g. > > http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/xmldsig2# My guess is that we'll be changing this significantly and that it's too early to give it a "meaningful" namespace. Hence the question. If we think that we should use a "final" namespace, then I'd propose / 2009/xmldsig2#
Received on Wednesday, 21 October 2009 21:24:55 UTC