- From: Ed Simon <edsimon@xmlsec.com>
- Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 15:09:25 -0400
- To: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
- Cc: XMLSec WG Public List <public-xmlsec@w3.org>, Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>
I'm wondering if there should not be non-security-specific (though security-aware) W3C specification for streamable XPath. In other words, maybe streamable XPath work should be led by those leading XPath (not the variety of other groups who need a streamable XPath). Of course, input to a streamable XPath specification must include input from the non-XPath groups. Ideally, we would have one streamable XPath specification that fulfils the needs of various applications. Ed On Wed, 2009-10-14 at 14:02 +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote: > Looking at the upcoming WS-Fragment Working Draft, I see yet another > XPath subset. > > http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/ra/snapshots/fpwd/frag/wsfrag.html#XPathL1 > > > I wonder whether it's worthwhile to spend a little bit of time > comparing motivations for their and our XPath subsets; we both seem to > be solving for some notion of "constrained resources". > > > Regards, > -- > Thomas Roessler, W3C <tlr@w3.org> > > > > > > > > >
Received on Wednesday, 14 October 2009 19:10:11 UTC