- From: Frederick Hirsch <frederick.hirsch@nokia.com>
- Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 17:21:22 -0500
- To: Makoto MURATA <eb2m-mrt@asahi-net.or.jp>
- Cc: Frederick Hirsch <frederick.hirsch@nokia.com>, XMLSec WG Public List <public-xmlsec@w3.org>
Makoto Do you have any comment on this? regards, Frederick Frederick Hirsch Nokia Begin forwarded message: > From: ext Ed Simon <edsimon@xmlsec.com> > Date: November 16, 2009 4:17:48 PM EST > To: XMLSec WG Public List <public-xmlsec@w3.org> > Subject: [ACTION-421] Reviews of latest RNG schema for XML Signature > 1.1 > Reply-To: "edsimon@xmlsec.com" <edsimon@xmlsec.com> > > Hi, > > I have taken a brief review (only visual inspection) of the latest RNG > schema for XML Signature 1.1. The only issue I notice is that the @Id > attribute of the <ECKeyValue> element does not seem to be optional in > the RNG schema though it is in the XML Signature 1.1 specification. > > Ed > >
Received on Monday, 16 November 2009 22:22:11 UTC