public-xmlsec@w3.org from March 2009 by date

Tuesday, 31 March 2009

• Widgets 1.0 Digital Signature Draft Published Frederick Hirsch

Monday, 30 March 2009

• Re: Transform Note Design Decisions Pratik Datta
• RE: Transform Note Design Decisions Scott Cantor
• Re: Transform Note Design Decisions Pratik Datta
• Re: Transform Note Design Decisions Frederick Hirsch
• Re: Transform Note Design Decisions Frederick Hirsch
• Agenda: Distributed Meeting 2009-03-31 Frederick Hirsch

Saturday, 28 March 2009

• Re: Transform Note Design Decisions Pratik Datta

Friday, 27 March 2009

• Re: Transform Note Design Decisions Thomas Roessler

Wednesday, 25 March 2009

• RE: Transform Note Design Decisions Scott Cantor
• Re: Transform Note Design Decisions Pratik Datta
• Transform Note Design Decisions Thomas Roessler

Monday, 23 March 2009

• Agenda: Distributed Meeting 2009-03-24 v2 (resend) Frederick Hirsch
• Agenda: Distributed Meeting 2009-03-24 v2 Nokia-CIC/Boston
• ACTION-236: Add ECKey value as child of KeyValueType Magnus Nyström

Sunday, 22 March 2009

• ACTION-235: SubjectPublicKeyInfo proposal Scott Cantor
• ACTION-237: questions to address with Signature 2.0 proposal Scott Cantor
• Agenda: Distributed Meeting 2009-03-24 (resend) Hirsch Frederick (Nokia-CIC/Boston)
• Agenda: Distributed Meeting 2009-03-24 Nokia-CIC/Boston

Friday, 20 March 2009

• Re: Explanation of section 4.5 of transform note Pratik Datta
• ACTION-233: Propose text covering semantics for curve validation Magnus Nyström
• Re: Explanation of section 4.5 of transform note Frederick Hirsch

Thursday, 19 March 2009

• RE: Explanation of section 4.5 of transform note Scott Cantor
• Explanation of section 4.5 of transform note Pratik Datta

Wednesday, 18 March 2009

• Updated Signature 1.1 Editors draft for Exclusive C14N Frederick Hirsch

Tuesday, 17 March 2009

• Re: padded AES key wrap Thomas Roessler
• ACTION-227: text specifying ECC curves in XMLENC Brian LaMacchia
• Streaming C14N vNext requirements Pratik Datta

Monday, 16 March 2009

• ACTION-229: Detailing differences in ECC scheme proposals Magnus Nyström

Thursday, 12 March 2009

• ISSUE-110 (visibly utilizes in Exc-C14N): Need better definition for "visibly utilizes" in Exc-C14N [Maint-ExC14N (Exclusive XML Canonicalization Version 1.0 Maintenance)] XML Security Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: RFC 5480 on Elliptic Curve Cryptography Subject Public Key Information Sean Mullan
• RE: RFC 5480 on Elliptic Curve Cryptography Subject Public Key Information Scott Cantor
• Re: RFC 5480 on Elliptic Curve Cryptography Subject Public Key Information Frederick Hirsch
• Re: RFC 5480 on Elliptic Curve Cryptography Subject Public Key Information Scott Cantor
• RE: RFC 5480 on Elliptic Curve Cryptography Subject Public Key Information Magnus.Nystrom@rsa.com

Wednesday, 11 March 2009

• Agenda: Distributed Meeting 2009-03-17 (resend) Frederick Hirsch
• Agenda: Distributed meeting 2009-03-17 Nokia-CIC/Boston
• Additional editors draft updates - Properties and Derived Key Frederick Hirsch
• RE: RFC 5480 on Elliptic Curve Cryptography Subject Public Key Information Scott Cantor
• Re: Interop Testing Frederick Hirsch
• Fwd: RFC 5480 on Elliptic Curve Cryptography Subject Public Key Information Thomas Roessler

Tuesday, 10 March 2009

• Updated Best Practices editors draft Frederick Hirsch
• Interop Testing Sean Mullan

Monday, 9 March 2009

• Introduction Peter Saint-Andre
• RE: To be resolved: is ISSUE-57 [name of element in end tag /] stillimportant? Edgar, Gerald
• Requirements as Issues (XML Signature and Canonicalization V Next Requirements) Edgar, Gerald
• Agenda: Distributed meeting 2009-03-10 v2 Frederick Hirsch

Saturday, 7 March 2009

• RE: Agenda: Distributed meeting 2009-03-10 Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com

Friday, 6 March 2009

• Re: Agenda: Distributed meeting 2009-03-10 Pratik Datta
• Agenda: Distributed meeting 2009-03-10 Nokia-CIC/Boston
• Re: (XML Signature Syntax and Processing Version 1.1) Some Algorithm URIs have extra spaces Frederick Hirsch
• ISSUE-109: Some Algorithm URIs have extra spaces [v11] XML Security Working Group Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-108: exclusive C14N is recommended and not required in the XML Signature 1.1 [v11] XML Security Working Group Issue Tracker
• Exclusive C14N Sean Mullan
• (XML Signature Syntax and Processing Version 1.1) Some Algorithm URIs have extra spaces Sean Mullan
• Re: To be resolved: is ISSUE-57 [name of element in end tag /] still important? Pratik Datta
• To be resolved: is ISSUE-57 [name of element in end tag /] still important? Edgar, Gerald

Thursday, 5 March 2009

• Resolve ISSUE-56 to be closed Edgar, Gerald

Tuesday, 3 March 2009

• Re: Review of latest Widget Signature Draft Frederick Hirsch

Monday, 2 March 2009

• Agenda: Distributed meeting 2009-03-03 (resend) Frederick Hirsch
• Agenda: Distributed meeting 2009-03-03 Nokia-CIC/Boston
• Additional Widgets 1.0 Digital Signatures updates Frederick Hirsch

Last message date: Tuesday, 31 March 2009 18:48:12 UTC