- From: Frederick Hirsch <frederick.hirsch@nokia.com>
- Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 13:47:09 -0400
- To: XMLSec WG Public List <public-xmlsec@w3.org>
- Cc: Frederick Hirsch <frederick.hirsch@nokia.com>
Received on Monday, 22 June 2009 17:48:51 UTC
[ moving to public list with permission ] see also comment at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec/2009Jun/0064.html Begin forwarded message: > From: ext Magnus Nyström <magnus@rsa.com> > Date: June 11, 2009 7:40:22 AM EDT > To: "member-xmlsec@w3.org" <member-xmlsec@w3.org> > Subject: First draft of key encapsulation proposal for XMLEnc > > [Wanted to take this on the member list first.] > > Attached is my initial take on how key encapsulation could be > integrated > into XMLEnc 11. See Sections 5.4 and 5.5. Note that Derived keys > schema > comes into play here as well (in addition to the separate discussion > on > ECDH); further suggesting (to me) that it could make sense to merge > the > two. > > Comments - both technical and editorial - are welcome, of course. > What is > missing still is an example for RSAES-KEM. > > (I am also suggesting we have a new algorithm section in 5.1: Key > Derivation Algorithms and list SP80056ConcatA as [MANDATORY if ECDH is > mandatory, OPTIONAL if it is not). > > -- Magnus
Received on Monday, 22 June 2009 17:48:51 UTC