Re: ISSUE-90 (addtluris): Define algorithm URIs for ecdsa-ripemd160 and ecdsa-whirlpool? [v11] from Thomas Roessler on 2009-01-22 (public-xmlsec@w3.org from January 2009)

From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 17:17:01 +0100
To: XML Security Working Group WG <public-xmlsec@w3.org>
Message-Id: <868ED0DF-BC4F-4C3B-A438-8070FA256446@w3.org>

Ignore -- turns out that this one got captured later on as ISSUE-83.   
I've closed ISSUE-90 in tracker.
--
Thomas Roessler, W3C  <tlr@w3.org>







On 22 Jan 2009, at 17:13, XML Security Working Group Issue Tracker  
wrote:

>
>
> ISSUE-90 (addtluris): Define algorithm URIs for ecdsa-ripemd160 and  
> ecdsa-whirlpool? [v11]
>
> http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/track/issues/90
>
> Raised by: Konrad Lanz
> On product: v11
>
>> From the recent face-to-face minutes: <klanz2> It seems that ecdsa- 
>> ripemd160 and ecdsa-whirlpool have not made it into a new version  
>> of RFC 4051 ... could we file an ISSUE for this ?
>
>
>

Received on Thursday, 22 January 2009 16:17:17 UTC