- From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 15:54:17 +0100
- To: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
- Cc: Frederick Hirsch <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>, XMLSec WG Public List <public-xmlsec@w3.org>
On 18 Feb 2009, at 00:24, Thomas Roessler wrote: > I propose that we use the following shortnames for the upcoming WDs: > > - XML Encryption 1.1 xmlenc-core11 > - XML Signature 1.1 xmldsig-core11 Strike that -- after discussion with the Comm Team, the suggestion is that we use the following scheme for these URIs (for XML Signature; equivalent for XML Encryption): 1. http://www.w3.org/TR/xmldsig-core points to the latest XML Signature recommendation, whether it's 1.x or 2.0 doesn't matter. 2. http://www.w3.org/TR/xmldsig-core1 points to the latest document (WD, Rec, ...) in the XML Signature 1.x series of specs. 3. http://www.w3.org/TR/xmldsig-core2 pointes to the latest document in the XML Signature 2.x series of specs. In addition, we would include a link to the latest XML Signature recommendation in the xmldsig-core1 Working Draft.
Received on Wednesday, 18 February 2009 14:54:26 UTC