- From: Frederick Hirsch <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>
- Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 18:51:43 -0500
- To: ext Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
- Cc: Frederick Hirsch <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>, XMLSec WG Public List <public-xmlsec@w3.org>
timezoned is fine with me regards, Frederick Frederick Hirsch Nokia On Feb 17, 2009, at 6:50 PM, ext Thomas Roessler wrote: > On 18 Feb 2009, at 00:27, Frederick Hirsch wrote: > >> Thanks for these suggested changes. By timezoned I assume you mean >> times must be expressed in UTC, if so would it be more obvious to >> state that times must be expressed as UTC (although timezoned is >> clear in conjunction with schema reference). > > Since the time zone mechanism for dateTime expressions can do without > reference to some external database, I don't think we need to impose > UTC. > > The main point here is that schema defines two different time scales, > and that comparison of an untimezoned and a timezoned value isn't > well- > defined > > (While I like the fact that every noun can be verbed in English, I > have to say that "timezoned" and "untimezoned" sound awful.) >
Received on Wednesday, 18 February 2009 00:06:36 UTC