Re: shortnames for upcoming drafts (objections by EOB Wednesday; ACTION-221)

On 18 Feb 2009, at 00:44, Frederick Hirsch wrote:

> XML Encryption can have properties as well, so even though the  
> current draft only has signature specific properties we may wish to  
> keep it as XML Security properties and keep shortname xmlsec- 
> properties.

Well, is there any likelihood that this specification will acquire  
encryption properties?  Just wondering.

Received on Tuesday, 17 February 2009 23:48:07 UTC