- From: Sean Mullan <Sean.Mullan@Sun.COM>
- Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 10:47:14 -0500
- To: Frederick Hirsch <frederick.hirsch@nokia.com>
- Cc: XMLSec WG Public List <public-xmlsec@w3.org>
In Security considerations regarding RSA key sizes: "XML Security 1.1 implementations should use ..." s/Security/Signature Frederick Hirsch wrote: > I have updated the XML Signature 1.1 Editors draft, please review it for > correctness and completeness before our 5 January call. > > http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/Drafts/xmldsig-core-11/Overview.htm > > I have reviewed all the changes since converting to ReSpec and corrected > all the errors found. You can see the changes since the conversion in a > redline I created [1]. > > I have also successfully run it through the W3C validator and link > checker tools, again correcting all errors found. (ACTION-478). There > are some redirects remaining that we may consider for additional link > updates. > > I also incorporated the following changes agreed in the WG: > > ACTION-464, MgmtData change, reflecting review edits, changed title of > 4.5.8 > > ACTION-466 Incorporate RSA key size text into document > > ACTION-467 Add action-404 proposal into editors draft, history why > DERKeyValue is not child of KeyValue > > ACTION-470 Change "see below" to link to section 6.2 in xml sig 1.1 > (changed in a number of places) > > ACTION-471 Add SHA-1 warning to 6.2.1 and fix DSS reference in sig 1.1 > > I made a minor change to the RSA key size text [2], changing > > "This XML Signature 1.1 revision REQUIRES all conforming implementations > to support RSA signature generation and verification with public keys at > least 2048 bits in length. " > > to > > "All conforming implementations of XML Signature 1.1 MUST support RSA > signature generation and verification with public keys at least 2048 > bits in length. " > > The reason was to be able to use RFC2119 keyword MUST. > > I updated the redline from XML Signature 2nd Edition [3]. > > Please review carefully as we plan to bring XML Signature 1.1 to Last > Call, deciding on 5 January meeting. > > regards, Frederick > > Frederick Hirsch > Nokia > > [1] > http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/Drafts/xmldsig-core-11/snapshots/Overview-Respec-diff.html > > > [2] > http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/Drafts/xmldsig-core-11/Overview.htm#sec-PKCS1 > > [3] http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/Drafts/xmldsig-core-11/Overview_diff.htm > > >
Received on Friday, 18 December 2009 15:48:02 UTC