- From: Brian LaMacchia <bal@exchange.microsoft.com>
- Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 08:00:53 +0000
- To: "public-xmlsec@w3.org" <public-xmlsec@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 15 December 2009 08:01:36 UTC
Regarding ACTION-404 ("Draft language that codifies history why DERKeyValue is not child of KeyValue (for section 4.4 of xmldsig-core1)"), I propose to add the following text to the end of Section 4.5.9: Historical note: The DEREncodedKeyValue element was added to XML Signature 1.1 in order to support certain interoperability scenarios where at least one of signer and/or verifier are not able to serialize keys in the XML formats described in Section 4.5.2 above. The KeyValue element is to be used for "bare" XML key representations (not XML wrappings around other binary encodings like ASN.1 DER); for this reason the DEREncodedKeyValue element is not a child of KeyValue, since no further structure is included. The DEREncodedKeyValue element is also not a child of the X509Data element, as the keys represented by DEREncodedKeyValue may not have X.509 certificates associated with them (a requirement for X509Data). --bal
Received on Tuesday, 15 December 2009 08:01:36 UTC