- From: Scott Cantor <cantor.2@osu.edu>
- Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 15:06:21 -0500
- To: "'Thomas Roessler'" <tlr@w3.org>
- Cc: "'XMLSec WG Public List'" <public-xmlsec@w3.org>, "'Carine Bournez'" <carine@w3.org>
Thomas Roessler wrote on 2009-12-14: > I'd basically aim to make clear that the base64 encoding is mandated > normatively elsewhere (i.e., in the schema). That can be done by turning it > into a parenthesis; I do take your point that it needs to be mentioned here. There are a number of base64Binary types in the schemas, but I'm not aware of any other cases in which the phrasing has been to imply that the schema is what dictates the encoding. E.g. the various KeyInfo types. I would say rather that the encoding is mandated by the spec, and the schema where possible reflects that. -- Scott
Received on Monday, 14 December 2009 20:07:08 UTC