- From: Frederick Hirsch <frederick.hirsch@nokia.com>
- Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 08:58:04 -0500
- To: XMLSec WG Public List <public-xmlsec@w3.org>
- Cc: Frederick Hirsch <frederick.hirsch@nokia.com>
Do we need more text in XML Signature 1.1 regarding the suitability (or lack thereof) of SHA-1, and maybe a reference to the NIST recommendation to use SHA2 going forward from 2010 as well as the crypto regarding SHA-1? We probably also need to add this to the 1.1 requirements as well. Does anyone have a good pointer to a paper outlining why SHA-1 is no longer suitable? Is the suitable NIST reference the following, or is there a better one? [[ March 15, 2006: The SHA-2 family of hash functions (i.e., SHA-224, SHA-256, SHA-384 and SHA-512) may be used by Federal agencies for all applications using secure hash algorithms. Federal agencies should stop using SHA-1 for digital signatures, digital time stamping and other applications that require collision resistance as soon as practical, and must use the SHA-2 family of hash functions for these applications after 2010. After 2010, Federal agencies may use SHA-1 only for the following applications: hash-based message authentication codes (HMACs); key derivation functions (KDFs); and random number generators (RNGs). Regardless of use, NIST encourages application and protocol designers to use the SHA-2 family of hash functions for all new applications and protocols. ]] http://csrc.nist.gov/groups/ST/toolkit/secure_hashing.html regards, Frederick Frederick Hirsch Nokia
Received on Friday, 11 December 2009 13:58:44 UTC