- From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 15:13:49 +0100
- To: XMLSec WG Public List <public-xmlsec@w3.org>
- Cc: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
After puzzling a bit about what on earth ISSUE-141 is supposed to mean, I believe that the appropriate resolution is an erratum against C14N 1.1 along the lines of what Ed proposed in this message: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec/2009Jul/0067.html I'll note that this is a mere clarification. The erratum could be: > E11-02: Clarification of processing model > > <dl> > <dt>Added:</dt><dd>@@</dd> > <dt>Accepted:</dt><dd>@@</dd> > <dt>Raised:</dt><dd>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec/2009Jul/0067.html</dd> > <dt>Class:</dt><dd>editorial</dd> > <dt>Affects conformance:</dt><dd>no</dd> > > <p>The first sentence of the second paragraph of <a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/xml-c14n11/#DataModel">section 2.1</a> is changed from:</p> > > <blockquote> > The first parameter of input to the XML canonicalization method is either an XPath node-set or an octet stream containing a well-formed XML document. > </blockquote> > > <p>to:</p> > > <blockquote> > The first parameter of input to the XML canonicalization method is > either an octet stream or an XPath node-set. If it is an octet stream, > the octet stream must contain a well-formed XML document. > </blockquote> -- Thomas Roessler, W3C <tlr@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 7 December 2009 14:13:51 UTC