- From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
- Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 17:01:13 -0400
- To: "Hirsch Frederick (Nokia-CIC/Boston)" <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>, public-xmlsec@w3.org
Frederick - re the XML Signature algorithms vis-à-vis the Widgets 1.0 Digital Signature spec [1], below are comments on Elliptic Curve from WebApps WG member SonyEricsson. -Regards, Art Barstow [1] <http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-widgets-digsig-20090331/> Begin forwarded message: > From: "ext Braun, Andrew" <Andrew.Braun@sonyericsson.com> > Date: March 4, 2009 9:16:55 AM EST > To: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org> > Subject: RE: [Widgets] Opera's position on Elliptic Curve and x509v3 > Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/ > B7B2E88280255C40A477C45E46CF6C25133776004C@usrtmbx01.corpusers.net> > > I agree with both of Marcos's points here. > > I support postponing elliptic curve to later version > > I also agree restricting x509 to version 3 is ok > > -----Original Message----- > From: public-webapps-request@w3.org [mailto:public-webapps- > request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Marcos Caceres > Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2009 6:25 AM > To: Frederick Hirsch; public-webapps; ext Priestley, Mark, VF-Group > Cc: Arve Bersvendsen > Subject: [Widgets] Opera's position on Elliptic Curve and x509v3 > > At the F2F, I agreed to ascertain Opera's position on adding elliptic > curve support and restricting x509 to version 3. > > Wrt Eliptic Curve, Opera would prefer _not_ to have elliptic curve > support for version 1 of Widgets Dig Sig, but would possibly like to > see its inclusion in future version of the spec. > > Wrt restricting to x509 to version 3, we are ok with this. > > Kind regards, > Marcos > > -- > Marcos Caceres > http://datadriven.com.au >
Received on Tuesday, 7 April 2009 21:02:00 UTC