- From: Magnus Nyström <magnus@rsa.com>
- Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 13:57:21 +0200 (W. Europe Daylight Time)
- To: XML Security Working Group WG <public-xmlsec@w3.org>
All,
Regarding ACTION-73, "Provide proposal to adapt Requirements scope":
Based on the earlier discussion on this topic, I am suggesting the
following:
Title:
------
Change title from
XML Signature and Canonicalization: Requirements and Design Notes
to
XML Security v.next Use Cases and Requirements
Scope/Content:
--------------
In order to have a consistent treatment of XML Enc as well as XML Sig and
simplify the layout of the text, I suggest changing the current
scope/content to:
1 Scope
2 Introduction
3 Usage scenarios
XML signature incl. canonicalization
XML encryption
4 XML Encryption Design Requirements
4.1 Fundamentals
4.2 Design Options
4.3 Requirements
5 XML Signature Design Requirements
(to include canonicalization Design Requirements as already in the
current Aug 20 draft)
5.1 Fundamentals
5.2 Design Options
5.3 Requirements
6 Acknowledgments
7 References
-- Magnus
Received on Wednesday, 1 October 2008 12:10:48 UTC