- From: Magnus Nyström <magnus@rsa.com>
- Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 13:57:21 +0200 (W. Europe Daylight Time)
- To: XML Security Working Group WG <public-xmlsec@w3.org>
All, Regarding ACTION-73, "Provide proposal to adapt Requirements scope": Based on the earlier discussion on this topic, I am suggesting the following: Title: ------ Change title from XML Signature and Canonicalization: Requirements and Design Notes to XML Security v.next Use Cases and Requirements Scope/Content: -------------- In order to have a consistent treatment of XML Enc as well as XML Sig and simplify the layout of the text, I suggest changing the current scope/content to: 1 Scope 2 Introduction 3 Usage scenarios XML signature incl. canonicalization XML encryption 4 XML Encryption Design Requirements 4.1 Fundamentals 4.2 Design Options 4.3 Requirements 5 XML Signature Design Requirements (to include canonicalization Design Requirements as already in the current Aug 20 draft) 5.1 Fundamentals 5.2 Design Options 5.3 Requirements 6 Acknowledgments 7 References -- Magnus
Received on Wednesday, 1 October 2008 12:10:48 UTC