- From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 15:05:37 +0100
- To: public-xmlsec-maintwg@w3.org
Minutes from our meeting on 2008-01-08 were approved and are
available online here:
http://www.w3.org/2008/01/08-xmlsec-minutes.html
A text version is included below the .signature.
--
Thomas Roessler, W3C <tlr@w3.org>
[1]W3C
XML Security Specifications Maintenance Working Group Teleconference
8 Jan 2008
[2]Agenda
See also: [3]IRC log
Attendees
Present
Thomas, jwray, pdatta, sean, Shivaram, brich, rdmiller,
Frederick_Hirsch, PHB, Ed_Simon, jcc, klanz2
Regrets
Hal Lockhart
Chair
Frederick_Hirsch
Scribe
BruceRich
Contents
* [4]Topics
1. [5]Admin
2. [6]C14N11 draft
3. [7]Interop and testcases
4. [8]Namespace document
5. [9]Chartering
6. [10]Best practices
7. [11]Action review
8. [12]AOB - EXI
* [13]Summary of Action Items
__________________________________________________________________
<trackbot-ng> Date: 08 January 2008
<tlr> ScribeNick: brich
<tlr> Scribe: BruceRich
<FrederickHirsch> Agenda:
[14]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec-maintwg/2008Jan/0
011.html
Admin
<tlr> Minutes from 11th Dec approved.
<tlr> [15]http://www.w3.org/2007/12/18-xmlsec-minutes-public.html
<tlr> [16]http://www.w3.org/2007/12/18-xmlsec-minutes.html
RESOLUTION: Minutes from 18th Dec approved
Frederick Should we go to biweekly meetings or stay with weekly and
shorten length?
<tlr> either way works for me
<shivaram> I like the idea of having shorter weekly meetings - it keeps
the momemtum
<EdS> +1 to shorter meetings
RESOLUTION: Keep weekly meetings, but shorten as needed
C14N11 draft
tlr No further input expected from us, told Core we are fine with
disposition of comments
Interop and testcases
Sean incorporated all comments except "unreadable output", updated spec
refs
tlr put a hack in place to deal with "unreadable output" issue, will
document convention followed, others are free to improve it
<FrederickHirsch>
[17]http://www.w3.org/2007/xmlsec/interop/xmldsig/c14n11/report.html
tlr updated the test report, would like comments before our meeting
next week
frederick how close are we to being done?
tlr depends on amount and volume of feedback
<FrederickHirsch>
[18]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec-maintwg/2008Jan/0
010.html
frederick proposed a fix to the test document for references to
Appendix A
RESOLUTION: Proposed fix to section 3.2.5 is accepted
<Zakim> tlr, you wanted to update about schedule
jcc Having hardware/software issues in completing interop test cases
assigned to him
<scribe> ACTION: Sean to implement fix to section 3.2.5 in testcase doc
[recorded in
[19]http://www.w3.org/2008/01/08-xmlsec-minutes.html#action01]
<trackbot-ng> Created ACTION-128 - Implement fix to section 3.2.5 in
testcase doc [on Sean Mullan - due 2008-01-15].
frederick is the testcase doc up to date? are more changes needed?
sean the c14n11 section is good
sean the xpointer tests are named incorrectly, inconsistent with
testcase doc
<FrederickHirsch> sean - DName tests not implemented, remove from doc
<scribe> ACTION: sean to rename the xpointer tests as per doc [recorded
in [20]http://www.w3.org/2008/01/08-xmlsec-minutes.html#action02]
<trackbot-ng> Created ACTION-129 - Rename the xpointer tests as per doc
[on Sean Mullan - due 2008-01-15].
tlr need to record which tests depend on an optional feature
<tlr> tlr: I think we should record that the test depends on optional
feature, we don't think it's critical path for PER implementation
report
<FrederickHirsch> tlr: including optional use of xslt
<FrederickHirsch> sean: removing DName tests makes sense, redundant,
not implemented
<FrederickHirsch> jcc: agree
RESOLUTION: Remove unused DName cases from the doc
jcc concerned about test case numbers moving around
<FrederickHirsch> leave the file names alone, do not renumber
<tlr> tlr: don't change filenames, just let the software do its thing
on section numbers
<FrederickHirsch> jcc: not change name of test cases
<FrederickHirsch> +1
<tlr> ... probably not worth the effort to have consecutively numbered
test cases ...
<scribe> ACTION: sean to remove unused DName cases from the doc
[recorded in
[21]http://www.w3.org/2008/01/08-xmlsec-minutes.html#action03]
<trackbot-ng> Created ACTION-130 - Remove unused DName cases from the
doc [on Sean Mullan - due 2008-01-15].
<tlr> FYI, the implementation report is member-confidential unless
changed
tlr still needs to do final polishing of doc, update acknowledgement
section, identify those sections for which testing was a good thing to
do, say what the testcases do
<FrederickHirsch> another reason not to change test names is to allow
referencing earlier discussion re those test cases
<FrederickHirsch>
[22]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec-maintwg/2008Jan/0
007.html
Namespace document
RESOLUTION: Accept change to namespace document
Chartering
<FrederickHirsch>
[23]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec-maintwg/2007Dec/0
031.htm
<tlr>
[24]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec-maintwg/2007Dec/0
031.html
<FrederickHirsch>
[25]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec-maintwg/2007Dec/0
031.html
Frederick If we make changes to signature, may have to open encryption,
is this a problem?
<pdatta> This is good
<tlr> I just made the change in the wiki
Frederick ...Put this in the latest update to the charter?
tlr suggest that a note be sent to the workshop participants requesting
review/input on charter
Ed sees absence of ECC in the charter as a possible void
<FrederickHirsch> Ed: ECC could be topic for XML Encryption
<FrederickHirsch> tlr: charter already broad, degree of support?
<FrederickHirsch> Rob: MITRE interested in ECC for XML Enc
<shivaram> just a note, ECC must be present as the federal gov suite-B
initiative requires it
<tlr> Anyone can look at that draft, and anyone can send comments to
public-xmlsec-discuss
frederick, wiki is public so interested (nonW3C) parties can review
<FrederickHirsch> [26]http://www.w3.org/2007/xmlsec/wiki/charter
<FrederickHirsch> ACTION: frederick update xmlsec public web page with
pointer to wiki draft charter [recorded in
[27]http://www.w3.org/2008/01/08-xmlsec-minutes.html#action04]
<trackbot-ng> Created ACTION-131 - Update xmlsec public web page with
pointer to wiki draft charter [on Frederick Hirsch - due 2008-01-15].
<tlr> ACTION: thomas to send message to public-xmlsec-discuss [recorded
in [28]http://www.w3.org/2008/01/08-xmlsec-minutes.html#action05]
<trackbot-ng> Created ACTION-132 - Send message to
public-xmlsec-discuss [on Thomas Roessler - due 2008-01-15].
<FrederickHirsch> ACTION: frederick to respond to magnus re DerivedKey
[recorded in
[29]http://www.w3.org/2008/01/08-xmlsec-minutes.html#action06]
<trackbot-ng> Created ACTION-133 - Respond to magnus re DerivedKey [on
Frederick Hirsch - due 2008-01-15].
Best practices
skipping for now, given Hal's absence
Action review
ACTION-74 Open
ACTION-112 Open
<tlr> ACTION-74 reassigned to fjh
ACTION-115 Open pending email from jcc
ACTION-123 Closed
<FrederickHirsch> no issues regarding naming changes or test case
updates
ACTION-124 Closed
<FrederickHirsch> see
[30]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-xmlsec-commits/0009.html
ACTION-125 Closed
AOB - EXI
jcc show 2 ways to encode an xml doc, one with schema and one without
jcc when don't have a schema, may be issues with xpath
frederick this is hard to understand without seeing the doc or examples
jcc need another couple of weeks to pursue
Summary of Action Items
[NEW] ACTION: frederick to respond to magnus re DerivedKey [recorded in
[31]http://www.w3.org/2008/01/08-xmlsec-minutes.html#action06]
[NEW] ACTION: frederick update xmlsec public web page with pointer to
wiki draft charter [recorded in
[32]http://www.w3.org/2008/01/08-xmlsec-minutes.html#action04]
[NEW] ACTION: Sean to implement fix to section 3.2.5 in testcase doc
[recorded in
[33]http://www.w3.org/2008/01/08-xmlsec-minutes.html#action01]
[NEW] ACTION: sean to remove unused DName cases from the doc [recorded
in [34]http://www.w3.org/2008/01/08-xmlsec-minutes.html#action03]
[NEW] ACTION: sean to rename the xpointer tests as per doc [recorded in
[35]http://www.w3.org/2008/01/08-xmlsec-minutes.html#action02]
[NEW] ACTION: thomas to send message to public-xmlsec-discuss [recorded
in [36]http://www.w3.org/2008/01/08-xmlsec-minutes.html#action05]
[End of minutes]
__________________________________________________________________
Minutes formatted by David Booth's [37]scribe.perl version 1.128
([38]CVS log)
$Date: 2008/01/15 14:05:11 $
References
1. http://www.w3.org/
2. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec-maintwg/2008Jan/0011.html
3. http://www.w3.org/2008/01/08-xmlsec-irc
4. http://www.w3.org/2008/01/08-xmlsec-minutes.html#agenda
5. http://www.w3.org/2008/01/08-xmlsec-minutes.html#item01
6. http://www.w3.org/2008/01/08-xmlsec-minutes.html#item02
7. http://www.w3.org/2008/01/08-xmlsec-minutes.html#item03
8. http://www.w3.org/2008/01/08-xmlsec-minutes.html#item04
9. http://www.w3.org/2008/01/08-xmlsec-minutes.html#item05
10. http://www.w3.org/2008/01/08-xmlsec-minutes.html#item06
11. http://www.w3.org/2008/01/08-xmlsec-minutes.html#item07
12. http://www.w3.org/2008/01/08-xmlsec-minutes.html#item07
13. http://www.w3.org/2008/01/08-xmlsec-minutes.html#ActionSummary
14. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec-maintwg/2008Jan/0011.html
15. http://www.w3.org/2007/12/18-xmlsec-minutes-public.html
16. http://www.w3.org/2007/12/18-xmlsec-minutes.html
17. http://www.w3.org/2007/xmlsec/interop/xmldsig/c14n11/report.html
18. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec-maintwg/2008Jan/0010.html
19. http://www.w3.org/2008/01/08-xmlsec-minutes.html#action01
20. http://www.w3.org/2008/01/08-xmlsec-minutes.html#action02
21. http://www.w3.org/2008/01/08-xmlsec-minutes.html#action03
22. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec-maintwg/2008Jan/0007.html
23. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec-maintwg/2007Dec/0031.htm
24. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec-maintwg/2007Dec/0031.html
25. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec-maintwg/2007Dec/0031.html
26. http://www.w3.org/2007/xmlsec/wiki/charter
27. http://www.w3.org/2008/01/08-xmlsec-minutes.html#action04
28. http://www.w3.org/2008/01/08-xmlsec-minutes.html#action05
29. http://www.w3.org/2008/01/08-xmlsec-minutes.html#action06
30. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-xmlsec-commits/0009.html
31. http://www.w3.org/2008/01/08-xmlsec-minutes.html#action06
32. http://www.w3.org/2008/01/08-xmlsec-minutes.html#action04
33. http://www.w3.org/2008/01/08-xmlsec-minutes.html#action01
34. http://www.w3.org/2008/01/08-xmlsec-minutes.html#action03
35. http://www.w3.org/2008/01/08-xmlsec-minutes.html#action02
36. http://www.w3.org/2008/01/08-xmlsec-minutes.html#action05
37. http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm
38. http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/
--
Thomas Roessler, W3C <tlr@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 15 January 2008 14:05:45 UTC