W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xmlsec-maintwg@w3.org > February 2008

Re: Minutes Feb. 26 2008

From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 19:03:14 +0100
To: Sean Mullan <Sean.Mullan@Sun.COM>
Cc: XMLSec <public-xmlsec-maintwg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20080226180314.GF71413@iCoaster.does-not-exist.org>

Online at:

  http://www.w3.org/2008/02/26-xmlsec-minutes.html

Thanks,
-- 
Thomas Roessler, W3C  <tlr@w3.org>




On 2008-02-26 12:40:30 -0500, Sean Mullan wrote:
> From: Sean Mullan <Sean.Mullan@Sun.COM>
> To: XMLSec <public-xmlsec-maintwg@w3.org>
> Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 12:40:30 -0500
> Subject: Minutes Feb. 26 2008
> List-Id: <public-xmlsec-maintwg.w3.org>
> X-Spam-Level: 
> Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/47C44F0E.8010301@sun.com>
> X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.1.6
> 

>    [1]W3C
> 
>                                    - DRAFT -
> 
>       XML Security Specifications Maintenance Working Group Teleconference
> 
> 26 Feb 2008
> 
>    [2]Agenda
> 
>    See also: [3]IRC log
> 
> Attendees
> 
>    Present
>           Ed Simon, Hal Lockhart, Sean Mullan, Frederick Hirsch, Phillip
>           Hallam Baker, Rob Miller, Donald Eastlake, Bruce Rich, Thomas
>           Roessler, Pratik Datta, John Wray
> 
>    Regrets
>           Juan_Carlos_Cruellas, Konrad_Lanz, Shivaram_Mysore
> 
>    Chair
>           Frederick Hirsch
> 
>    Scribe
>           Sean Mullan
> 
> Contents
> 
>      * [4]Topics
>          1. [5]Administrivia
>          2. [6]chartering
>          3. [7]test case doc
>          4. [8]Best Practices
>          5. [9]action item review
>          6. [10]any other business
>      * [11]Summary of Action Items
>      __________________________________________________________________
> 
> 
> 
>    <trackbot-ng> Date: 26 February 2008
> 
>    <PHB> Testy testy testy test.... Plz ignore
> 
>    <tlr> so you're in a testy mood today?
> 
>    <tlr> [12]http://demotivators.com/mis24x30prin.html
> 
>    <fjh> Scribe: Sean Mullan
> 
>    <sean> * yes
> 
> Administrivia
> 
>    <sean> rob is scribe next week
> 
>    <fjh> suggest cancelling calls on March 11 and March 25
> 
>    <brich> +1
> 
>    <tlr> +1
> 
>    <sean> RESOLUTION: cancel calls on March 11 and March 25
> 
>    <fjh>
>    [13]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-xmlsec-maintwg/2008Feb/0
>    005.html
> 
> chartering
> 
>    <fjh> working on draft charter
> 
>    <fjh> [14]http://www.w3.org/2008/02/xmlsec-charter.html
> 
>    <tlr> draft charter will go into AC review soon now, maybe a few minor
>    edits
> 
>    <fjh> [15]http://www.w3.org/2008/02/19-xmlsec-minutes.html
> 
>    <fjh> can we approve minutes?
> 
>    <sean> RESOLUTION: February 19 minutes approved
> 
> test case doc
> 
>    <fjh>
>    [16]http://www.w3.org/2007/xmlsec/interop/xmlsig-interop-doc/testcases.
>    html
> 
>    <tlr> sorry, no progress on that one yet
> 
> Best Practices
> 
>    fjh: not essential, nice to have
>    ... could pull sth together ..
>    ... might put sth on list if time ...
>    ... calls next week, in two weeks after that ...
>    ... need to decide that we're either doing or not doing it ...
>    ... in reality, new group to start in mid-May ...
>    ... at least that's my anticipation ...
>    ... this one might go on a tad beyond end of March ...
>    ... if we want to, could use some of that time ...
> 
>    tlr: should take up overtime vs extension question at transition call
> 
>    fjh: discussed that at CG
> 
>    hal: do we expect more people -- slot?
> 
>    fjh: open to suggestions
>    ... don't know who else would join ...
> 
>    hal: time slot unattractive for west coast
> 
>    fjh: assuming people here interested in continuing
> 
>    <tlr> suggest time slot for working group to decide
> 
>    fjh: don't erase slot from calendars
> 
>    hal: not much competition
> 
>    fjh: make progress on best practices
>    ... not a showstopper if not
> 
> action item review
> 
>    <tlr> ACTION-145?
> 
>    <trackbot-ng> ACTION-145 -- Sean Mullan to look at W3C document license
>    compatibility with sharing test cases with Apache -- due 2008-02-19 --
>    OPEN
> 
>    <trackbot-ng> [17]http://www.w3.org/2007/xmlsec/Group/track/actions/145
> 
>    <tlr> sean: Apache is happy to include test cases under W3C document
>    license.
> 
>    <tlr> ACTION-145 closed
> 
>    <fjh> sean, can you send a quick e-mail?
> 
>    <sean> don't want to speak on behalf of legal folks
> 
>    <fjh> maybe just say the action is done, and here's the result
> 
>    <tlr> trackbot-ng, close ACTION-145
> 
>    <trackbot-ng> ACTION-145 Look at W3C document license compatibility
>    with sharing test cases with Apache closed
> 
>    <tlr> ACTION-147 continued
> 
>    ACTION 147 still open
> 
>    <tlr> ACTION-148 continued
> 
> any other business
> 
>    tlr: check in with donald about dsig core PR
>    ... maybe minor changes then proposed rec
>    ... donald, what is your timeline?
> 
>    donald: reformatting not too bad
>    ... polished internet draft probably by end of March
> 
>    fjh: what else besides formatting?
> 
>    donald: ietf last call
>    ... meeting week of march 10, check if we have a sponsor
>    ... they might have changes but don't forsee technical changes
>    ... then 4 week last call
>    ... push ahead, can't predict exactly how long
>    ... unlikely large problems will arise
> 
>    <tlr> 9-14 March
> 
>    <tlr> [18]http://www.ietf.org/meetings/71-IETF.html
> 
>    fjh: how should we track this?
> 
>    donald: just mechanical, will report back on progress
> 
>    <sean> is this the "revised algorithm URIs" RFC
> 
>    <donald> tried to keep that draft open for a while
> 
>    <tlr> ... getting some complaints ...
> 
>    <tlr> ... this conversation was about dsig-core ...
> 
>    <fjh> original document was joint effort
> 
>    <tlr> ... there were two publications ...
> 
>    <donald> there were actually two publications in the IETF
> 
>    <tlr> ... draft standard, one minor feature taken out ...
> 
>    donald: did an additional version of alg uri draft
>    ... will spin a new draft and notify people when i do that
>    ... inclined to get it done sooner rather than later
> 
>    fjh: anything else?
>    ... hal where do we stand with best practices?
> 
>    hal: try to get something out by mid to late march
> 
>    adjourned
> 
> Summary of Action Items
> 
>    [End of minutes]
>      __________________________________________________________________
> 
> References
> 
>    1. http://www.w3.org/
>    2. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec-maintwg/2008Feb/0030.html
>    3. http://www.w3.org/2008/02/26-xmlsec-irc
>    4. file://localhost/Users/tlr/.tmp/26-xmlsec-minutes.html#agenda
>    5. file://localhost/Users/tlr/.tmp/26-xmlsec-minutes.html#item01
>    6. file://localhost/Users/tlr/.tmp/26-xmlsec-minutes.html#item02
>    7. file://localhost/Users/tlr/.tmp/26-xmlsec-minutes.html#item03
>    8. file://localhost/Users/tlr/.tmp/26-xmlsec-minutes.html#item04
>    9. file://localhost/Users/tlr/.tmp/26-xmlsec-minutes.html#item05
>   10. file://localhost/Users/tlr/.tmp/26-xmlsec-minutes.html#item06
>   11. file://localhost/Users/tlr/.tmp/26-xmlsec-minutes.html#ActionSummary
>   12. http://demotivators.com/mis24x30prin.html
>   13. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-xmlsec-maintwg/2008Feb/0005.html
>   14. http://www.w3.org/2008/02/xmlsec-charter.html
>   15. http://www.w3.org/2008/02/19-xmlsec-minutes.html
>   16. http://www.w3.org/2007/xmlsec/interop/xmlsig-interop-doc/testcases.html
>   17. http://www.w3.org/2007/xmlsec/Group/track/actions/145
>   18. http://www.ietf.org/meetings/71-IETF.html
Received on Tuesday, 26 February 2008 18:03:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 19:58:43 UTC