- From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 19:04:18 +0100
- To: Frederick Hirsch <frederick.hirsch@nokia.com>
- Cc: XMLSec XMLSec <public-xmlsec-maintwg@w3.org>
On 2008-02-25 12:27:48 -0500, Frederick Hirsch wrote: > A more concise wording of the OASIS related TC work is the following: > The Working Group should coordinate with OASIS Technical Committees (TCs) > that are direct users of XML Security and possible sources of use cases and > requirements for this work. These TCs may also review relevant deliverables > of this WG. Such TCs in the security area include the Digital Signature > Services eXtended (DSS-X) TC, the eXtensible Access Control Markup Language > (XACML) TC, the Security Services Technical Committee (SSTC), the Web > Services Federation (WSFED) TC and the Web Services Secure Exchange (WS-SX) > TC. Other TCs making direct use of XML Signature > include the Election and Voter Services TC, the LegalXML Electronic Court > Filing TC, the Universal Business Language (UBL) TC, and the Web Services > Transaction (WS-TX) TC. I've taken a variant of that into the current charter draft: http://www.w3.org/2008/02/xmlsec-charter.html The text now suggests that the Group *should* seek review from the security TCs, and just mentions the other ones. > TCs that make indirect use of XML Signature include the ebXML TC > and the Provisioning Services TC, both of which use Web Services > Security (WSS) that utilizes XML Security. I'd rather not go down the route of indirect dependencies -- I fear that list could grow pretty rapidly if we track them all down... -- Thomas Roessler, W3C <tlr@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 25 February 2008 18:04:28 UTC