Re: [fwd] The RELAX NG schema for XML-Signature (from: eb2m-mrt@asahi-net.or.jp)

Upon pondering, it appears that it might be best to publish the RNG
schema in a Working Group Note emanating from this group, to enable
others to reference it.

The editorial work for that would be fairly minimal; I've put a
barebones editor's draft here:

  http://www.w3.org/2007/xmlsec/Drafts/xmldsig-rngschema/

However, it would be useful if (assuming we decide to go this way)
one or two members of the group could actually review the schema and
verify that it seems correct.

Thoughts, anyone?

Regards,
-- 
Thomas Roessler, W3C  <tlr@w3.org>






On 2008-04-02 11:13:20 +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
> To: public-xmlsec-maintwg@w3.org
> Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 11:13:20 +0200
> Subject: [fwd] The RELAX NG schema for XML-Signature (from:
> 	eb2m-mrt@asahi-net.or.jp)
> X-Spam-Level: 
> X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.1.6
> 
> I'm currently looking at what the appropriate response is from a
> Team perspective.
> 
> FYI.
> -- 
> Thomas Roessler, W3C  <tlr@w3.org>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Forwarded message from "MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given)" <eb2m-mrt@asahi-net.or.jp> -----
> 
> From: "MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given)" <eb2m-mrt@asahi-net.or.jp>
> To: joseph.2003@reagle.org
> Cc: MURATA Makoto <eb2m-mrt@asahi-net.or.jp>, w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org
> Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2008 09:01:57 +0900
> Subject: The RELAX NG schema for XML-Signature
> List-Id: <w3c-ietf-xmldsig.w3.org>
> X-Spam-Level: 
> Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/20080402090005.F7CD.EB2M-MRT@asahi-net.or.jp>
> X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.1.6
> 
> 
> Dear Joseph,
> 
> You kindly created a RELAX NG schema for XML-Signature.  I 
> find it available at:
> 
> 	http://www.w3.org/Signature/2002/07/xmldsig-core-schema.rng
> 
> This is linked from http://www.w3.org/Signature/.
> 
> The upcoming OOXML standard from JTC1 uses both W3C XML Schema and 
> RELAX NG.  Since OOXML relies on XML signature, it has to uses schemas 
> for XML-Signature.
> 
> The WXS version of the OOXML schema relies on 
> http://www.w3.org/TR/xmldsig-core/xmldsig-core-schema.xsd, 
> which is official.  The OOXML specification does not include 
> this schema, but merely references to it.  I believe that W3C 
> has no problems about that.
> 
> The RNG version of the OOXML schema is different.  Since 
> your schema uses the XML syntax and the OOXML schema 
> uses the compact syntax, the OOXML schema in RELAX NG 
> cannot reference to your schema.  I thus translated
> your schema to the compact syntax using trang and 
> the result is attached.
> 
> Now, we have a problem.  Can ISO/IEC and Ecma publish the 
> attached schema as part of the OOXML specification?  I am 
> not sure if this is acceptable to W3C.  Or, is it possible 
> for W3C to publish the attached schema?  If this is possible, 
> the OOXML specification can merely references to what 
> W3C publishes.
> 
> Looking forward to hearing from you.
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given) <EB2M-MRT@asahi-net.or.jp>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ----- End forwarded message -----
> 
>

Received on Wednesday, 2 April 2008 14:03:46 UTC