Re: Action 107: Send an email re test case 102

Konrad Lanz wrote:
> Hi Sean,
> 
> If we change this we wouldn't be "1 to 1" testing the example in the
> c14n 1.1 spec any more.

Then we should change the example in the spec to use xml:id as well.

--Sean

> 
> Konrad
> 
> Sean Mullan wrote:
>> Regarding the new test cases for the xml:base issue, I believe the issue 
>> raised is that the input documents use ID attributes rather than xml:id 
>> attributes. In fact, they use a mixture of both. Here is the 
>> xmlbase-c14n11spec-input.xml file:
>>
>> <!DOCTYPE doc [
>> <!ATTLIST e2 xml:space (default|preserve) 'preserve'>
>> <!ATTLIST e3 id ID #IMPLIED>
>> ]>
>> <doc xmlns="http://www.ietf.org" xmlns:w3c="http://www.w3.org" 
>> xml:base="http://www.example.com/something/else">
>>     <e1>
>>        <e2 xmlns="" xml:id="abc" xml:base="../bar/">
>>           <e3 id="E3" xml:base="foo"/>
>>        </e2>
>>     </e1>
>> </doc>
>>
>> I suggest we change these to use all xml:id attributes in order to be 
>> consistent with the rest of the test cases:
>>
>> <!DOCTYPE doc [
>> <!ATTLIST e2 xml:space (default|preserve) 'preserve'>
>> <doc xmlns="http://www.ietf.org" xmlns:w3c="http://www.w3.org" 
>> xml:base="http://www.example.com/something/else">
>>     <e1>
>>        <e2 xmlns="" xml:id="abc" xml:base="../bar/">
>>           <e3 xml:id="E3" xml:base="foo"/>
>>        </e2>
>>     </e1>
>> </doc>
>>
>> If there are any objections or questions, let me know.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Sean
>>
>>   
> 
> 

Received on Tuesday, 30 October 2007 20:47:32 UTC