- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip <pbaker@verisign.com>
- Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 08:29:13 -0700
- To: "Anthony Nadalin" <drsecure@us.ibm.com>, "Thomas Roessler" <tlr@w3.org>
- Cc: <public-xmlsec-maintwg@w3.org>, <public-xmlsec-maintwg-request@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <2788466ED3E31C418E9ACC5C31661557084F1D@mou1wnexmb09.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
How little canonicalization do you want to do? If we have a signature that is a referenced document that just happens to be XML encoded there is absolutely no need for c14n. If we have a signature that is wrapped around the signed object the process is slightly trickier, if the signature is inside the signed object its harder still. I certainly agree that there are many cases where c14n is unnecessary. I suspect however that to make it work well in the last two cases we will have to specify the enveloping mechanism more tightly than we do with XSL transformations. and the like. ________________________________ From: public-xmlsec-maintwg-request@w3.org on behalf of Anthony Nadalin Sent: Mon 29/10/2007 9:36 AM To: Thomas Roessler Cc: public-xmlsec-maintwg@w3.org; public-xmlsec-maintwg-request@w3.org Subject: Re: Initial thoughts on chartering So one item missing from list is ways not to have to use C14N (of any type) Anthony Nadalin | Work 512.838.0085 | Cell 512.289.4122 Inactive hide details for Thomas Roessler ---10/29/2007 08:21:24 AM---As a reminder, some initial thoughts on chartering of fol<https://webmail.verisign.com/exchange/philip.baker/Drafts/graycol.gif> Thomas Roessler ---10/29/2007 08:21:24 AM---As a reminder, some initial thoughts on chartering of follow-up work <https://webmail.verisign.com/exchange/philip.baker/Drafts/ecblank.gif> From: <https://webmail.verisign.com/exchange/philip.baker/Drafts/ecblank.gif> Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org> <https://webmail.verisign.com/exchange/philip.baker/Drafts/ecblank.gif> To: <https://webmail.verisign.com/exchange/philip.baker/Drafts/ecblank.gif> public-xmlsec-maintwg@w3.org <https://webmail.verisign.com/exchange/philip.baker/Drafts/ecblank.gif> Date: <https://webmail.verisign.com/exchange/philip.baker/Drafts/ecblank.gif> 10/29/2007 08:21 AM <https://webmail.verisign.com/exchange/philip.baker/Drafts/ecblank.gif> Subject: <https://webmail.verisign.com/exchange/philip.baker/Drafts/ecblank.gif> Initial thoughts on chartering ________________________________ As a reminder, some initial thoughts on chartering of follow-up work are here: http://www.w3.org/2007/xmlsec/wiki/charter This is mostly an initial list of tasks. It would be useful to have this reviewed in time for the call tomorrow, as this document is on the agenda for it. Regards, -- Thomas Roessler, W3C <tlr@w3.org>
Attachments
- image/gif attachment: graycol.gif
- image/gif attachment: ecblank.gif
Received on Monday, 29 October 2007 15:33:24 UTC