W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xmlhypermedia@w3.org > June 2013

RE: document node attributes

From: David Lee <David.Lee@marklogic.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 15:59:30 +0000
To: "stephengreenubl@gmail.com" <stephengreenubl@gmail.com>
CC: "liam@w3.org" <liam@w3.org>, "Rushforth, Peter" <Peter.Rushforth@nrcan-rncan.gc.ca>, "public-xmlhypermedia@w3.org" <public-xmlhypermedia@w3.org>
Message-ID: <6AD72D76C2D6F04D8BE471B70D4B991E1383CC@EXCHG10-BE02.marklogic.com>
Serious side note.
Whats wrong with HTML5 if you want Web Content ?
(or xHTML5 ... which I think sorta exists)

If you want pages to show on the web that people will read, HTML is the format to send them.

If we want better Linking (HyperMedia) for web content .. .maybe the HTML group(s) are the ones to go after.

David Lee
Lead Engineer
MarkLogic Corporation
Phone: +1 812-482-5224
Cell:  +1 812-630-7622

From: Stephen D Green [mailto:stephengreenubl@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, June 28, 2013 11:34 AM
To: David Lee
Cc: liam@w3.org; Rushforth, Peter; public-xmlhypermedia@w3.org
Subject: Re: document node attributes

Progress towards 'Web XML'
that "precludes the requrement of going into XML Core"
seems bearable to me, though somewhat disappointing
(compared to the alternative dream that XML might eventually not need a 'Web XML' but, instead, fulfill our concept of 'Web XML').
Stephen D Green

On 28 June 2013 15:51, David Lee <David.Lee@marklogic.com<mailto:David.Lee@marklogic.com>> wrote:


If we can't agree on this I dont know how to proceed.
If we can agree on this then to make progress further discussion should preclude the requrement of going into XML Core.
It may mean a non-XML vocabulary, or special namespaces or non-namespaced attributes or something we havent thought of yet.
Received on Friday, 28 June 2013 15:59:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:42:06 UTC