W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xmlhypermedia@w3.org > June 2013

RE: The Web as an Application

From: David Lee <David.Lee@marklogic.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2013 22:22:13 +0000
To: "Rushforth, Peter" <Peter.Rushforth@NRCan-RNCan.gc.ca>
CC: "public-xmlhypermedia@w3.org" <public-xmlhypermedia@w3.org>
Message-ID: <6AD72D76C2D6F04D8BE471B70D4B991E11F23D@EXCHG10-BE02.marklogic.com>

> If we can agree, but we dont like it then the next step is to 
> request to be members of the XML WG and take the issue up with them.

I think they've already spoken to that issue:


So I'm not optimistic either, but it would be ideal to lay out
a good proposed spec and they can decide on the merits anyway.


Let's start here.   I assert it is absolutely NOT ideal to put effort into something that has no chance of success.  But I suppose 
it depends on what your goals are.  Adoption of the concept in some form or putting something into the xml: namespace or nothing.
The XML WG had Closed this request.  Other previous indications are that they will not accept similar requests.
I personally am not willing to invest time fighting this windmill.

If you are happy to work on a proposal that does *not* require the XML WG to add more names to the reserved xml: namespace then  I am willing to spend some effort to help that along.
If you are not, then I am not going to find the time and willpower in me to do so.  Others might.

I suggest a good proposed spec should be outside the xml namespace.
If we can get good adoption of *that* then it might conceivably someday be incorporated into xml:  ... maybe.  Although even then unlikely.   

If that is unacceptable, there is not much more help I can give.  You are welcome to work on it and gain others help though.
I dont want to pretend I am actually in charge of anything except my own time.

Received on Thursday, 6 June 2013 22:22:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:42:06 UTC