- From: Rushforth, Peter <Peter.Rushforth@NRCan-RNCan.gc.ca>
- Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2012 10:27:10 +0000
- To: David Lee <dlee@calldei.com>, David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>, "liam@w3.org" <liam@w3.org>
- CC: "public-xmlhypermedia@w3.org" <public-xmlhypermedia@w3.org>
Liam, David(s), I was hoping for some comments on this idea, which seems especially topical given the preference for the MicroXML CG to drop all colon-names. In particular, the concept of a 'virtual' link on say the document node might be a data model issue. Is this conceivable? My perspective is you can pretty much declare the semantics you want when you define a media type. But if it is theoretically incompatible with the data model, maybe that presents a problem :-). In short, for others who might not want to read Liam's full paper, by combining a new XML media type with generic, XML web-style links + automatic namespaces, one can get rid of colon names without getting rid of the benefits of namespaces. Thanks Peter ________________________________________ From: Rushforth, Peter [Peter.Rushforth@NRCan-RNCan.gc.ca] Sent: August 2, 2012 1:03 PM To: public-xmlhypermedia@w3.org Subject: use cases Hi Folks, I've added more beef to the use cases for automatic namespaces and "NeoXML". Please have a look and let me know if there are details that could be improved. I seem to be working in a layered fashion, but we can always go back and amplify something if it does not support the layer above. I hope this will help build the case for each and every vowel proposed. So first read automatic namespaces, then read NeoXML: http://www.w3.org/community/xmlhypermedia/wiki/Distributed_extensibility_/_automatic_namespaces http://www.w3.org/community/xmlhypermedia/wiki/NeoXML_/_NanoXML Send comments back here. Thanks Peter
Received on Sunday, 19 August 2012 10:27:43 UTC