- From: mca <mca@amundsen.com>
- Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2012 19:01:42 -0400
- To: public-xmlhypermedia@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAPW_8m6tb7VYuxfK+LHN2usdU9dWUC4YCbuTxQ18odz5UUe7XA@mail.gmail.com>
All: I posted this last week in order to gain some clarity on goals/objectives and, aside from Mike Kelly's remark, I've seen no replies. I'd like to hear from others (esp. David Lee and PeterR) if this statement has anything of merit, points in the proper direction, etc. If not, that's fine and I'd like to hear about that, too. mca +1.859.757.1449 http://amundsen.com/blog/ http://twitter.com@mamund http://mamund.com/foaf.rdf#me On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 1:31 PM, Mike Kelly <mikekelly321@gmail.com> wrote: > hey, that sounds like HAL! :) > > On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 5:31 PM, mca <mca@amundsen.com> wrote: > >> Let's try this... >> >> >> I am interested in a set of affordance definitions for the XML format for >> effectively and efficiently expressing protocol-level state transitions >> (i.e. follow this link, embed the content at this link the current >> document, format a query string URL using the following arguments and send >> the request to the server, format a body using the following arguments and >> send it to the server, etc.). >> >> I am esp. interested in a set of affordance definitions that are >> "domain-agnostic", IOW ones that are not tied to a single problem domain >> (accounting, document management, etc.) since this could allow/encourage >> the creation of standard libraries (similar to other XML-related >> technologies (XSLT, XSD, XInclude, etc.) that can then be applied to a wide >> range of server and client implementations and problem domains. >> >> >> mca >> +1.859.757.1449 >> http://amundsen.com/blog/ >> http://twitter.com@mamund >> http://mamund.com/foaf.rdf#me >> >> >> > > > -- > Mike > > http://twitter.com/mikekelly85 > http://github.com/mikekelly > http://linkedin.com/in/mikekelly123 >
Received on Wednesday, 1 August 2012 23:02:30 UTC