[Bug 16180] should schZ014_a be valid?


Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
                 CC|                            |mike@saxonica.com

--- Comment #1 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> 2012-04-13 16:18:41 UTC ---
Personal response: I would contend that there are three "reasonable"
interpretations of <xsl:import namespace=""/>:

(a) it's an error

(b) it's equivalent to omitting the namespace attribute

(c) it's equivalent to omitting the xsl:import element

I think the spec currently doesn't give any support to any of these
interpretations, and my preference would be for (a).

Saxon currently adopts (b), which means this schema document is invalid because
the namespace is the same as the target namespace of the containing schema

Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.

Received on Friday, 13 April 2012 16:18:47 UTC