- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2007 17:20:08 +0000
- To: public-xml-schema-testsuite@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4147 Summary: MS Particles tests: particlesV020 Product: XML Schema Test Suite Version: 2006-11-06 Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows XP Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Microsoft tests AssignedTo: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk ReportedBy: mike@saxonica.com QAContact: public-xml-schema-testsuite@w3.org In the Microsoft Particles test set, test <test group="particlesV020" name="particlesV020"/> the schema is described as invalid. XSV also reports it invalid, but I am not convinced this is supported by a reading of the spec. In private correspondence, Henry Thompson suggested that R is not validly derived from B, because the type of bar is derived from the type of SUB by extension, not by restriction. However, the rule: 2.1 Any top-level element declaration particle (in R or B) which is the {substitution group affiliation} of one or more other element declarations and whose ·substitution group· contains at least one element declaration other than itself is treated as if it were a choice group whose {min occurs} and {max occurs} are those of the particle, and whose {particles} consists of one particle with {min occurs} and {max occurs} of 1 for each of the declarations in its ·substitution group·. suggests that it boils down to a question of whether <element name="bar" type="x:c2"/> is validly derived from <choice> <element name="SUB" type="x:c1"/> <element name="bar" type="x:c2"/> </choice> and it would seem that it is, regardless of the relationship of x:c1 to x:c2.
Received on Wednesday, 3 January 2007 17:20:14 UTC