- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2007 18:22:30 +0000
- To: public-xml-schema-testsuite@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4136 Summary: Microsoft "schema" test set, schU3 (duplicate definitions) Product: XML Schema Test Suite Version: 2006-11-06 Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows XP Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Microsoft tests AssignedTo: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk ReportedBy: mike@saxonica.com QAContact: public-xml-schema-testsuite@w3.org Test schU3 consists of a set of five schema documents with complex include/import/redefine relationships. According to the metadata it is valid. I believe that it is invalid. Module b includes module d without redefining it. This acquires a definition of attribute group c-g1. Module b also redefines module c, acquiring another definition of attribute group c-g1. I think there are therefore two conflicting definitions of this attribute group, and the schema should be rejected as invalid for this reason. (There are other conflicts as well, over complex type c-ct and element declaration c-e1).
Received on Tuesday, 2 January 2007 18:22:45 UTC