- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2007 18:22:30 +0000
- To: public-xml-schema-testsuite@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4136
Summary: Microsoft "schema" test set, schU3 (duplicate
definitions)
Product: XML Schema Test Suite
Version: 2006-11-06
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows XP
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: Microsoft tests
AssignedTo: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
ReportedBy: mike@saxonica.com
QAContact: public-xml-schema-testsuite@w3.org
Test schU3 consists of a set of five schema documents with complex
include/import/redefine relationships. According to the metadata it is valid. I
believe that it is invalid.
Module b includes module d without redefining it. This acquires a definition of
attribute group c-g1. Module b also redefines module c, acquiring another
definition of attribute group c-g1. I think there are therefore two conflicting
definitions of this attribute group, and the schema should be rejected as
invalid for this reason.
(There are other conflicts as well, over complex type c-ct and element
declaration c-e1).
Received on Tuesday, 2 January 2007 18:22:45 UTC