- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2006 17:22:24 +0000
- To: Chris <chrishe@hmgcc.gsi.gov.uk>
- Cc: public-xml-schema-testsuite@w3.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Chris writes: > Are the 2004 tests meant to replace the first edition tests (20020116) > or should they be run as well? I ask because the 2002 tests seem to be > riddled with inconsistencies, some of which are detailed below. Are > they deprecated? They will be overtaken very soon, but they did supplement the 2004 tests, which only addressed datatypes. > Furthermore, do the tests assume the validation validates against the > schema pointed to in the instance document or against the schema > specified in the "schemaTest" element of the testGroup in the testSet > file? The tests which include an instance should be run providing all the schemas listed in the schemaTest element. > NISTXMLSchema1-0-20020116.testSet > ---------------------------------- > line 22: missing /nisttest/ in relative path Will be overtaken by new release > MSXMLSchema1-0-20020116.testSet > --------------------------------- > line 41904: idZ003, no files specified fixed in new contribution > SunXMLSchema1-0-20020116.testSet > -------------------------------- > idc001.nogen.n00 should be valid or idc001.nogen.v01 should be > invalid depending on whether BookCatalogue.xsd is supposed to be there > or not... Probably all refs should be idc001.nogen.xsd instead Indeed, fixed in the new contribution > xsd003b.xsd - Should be invalid as: > there is no xsd:number type. > src-attribute_group.3 Circular reference to > attribute group definition 'attGroup' Changed to xsd:decimal in new contribution Thanks for your help, ht - -- Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh Half-time member of W3C Team 2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440 Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/ [mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFUhJQkjnJixAXWBoRAh0HAJ9dKVzFU/XFqCWTqbZTHNT88kiOEQCfegcq dIqrPny5KcIHWckuUGUVfJk= =lQ3F -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Wednesday, 8 November 2006 17:22:33 UTC