- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2006 17:22:24 +0000
- To: Chris <chrishe@hmgcc.gsi.gov.uk>
- Cc: public-xml-schema-testsuite@w3.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Chris writes:
> Are the 2004 tests meant to replace the first edition tests (20020116)
> or should they be run as well? I ask because the 2002 tests seem to be
> riddled with inconsistencies, some of which are detailed below. Are
> they deprecated?
They will be overtaken very soon, but they did supplement the 2004
tests, which only addressed datatypes.
> Furthermore, do the tests assume the validation validates against the
> schema pointed to in the instance document or against the schema
> specified in the "schemaTest" element of the testGroup in the testSet
> file?
The tests which include an instance should be run providing all the
schemas listed in the schemaTest element.
> NISTXMLSchema1-0-20020116.testSet
> ----------------------------------
> line 22: missing /nisttest/ in relative path
Will be overtaken by new release
> MSXMLSchema1-0-20020116.testSet
> ---------------------------------
> line 41904: idZ003, no files specified
fixed in new contribution
> SunXMLSchema1-0-20020116.testSet
> --------------------------------
> idc001.nogen.n00 should be valid or idc001.nogen.v01 should be
> invalid depending on whether BookCatalogue.xsd is supposed to be there
> or not... Probably all refs should be idc001.nogen.xsd instead
Indeed, fixed in the new contribution
> xsd003b.xsd - Should be invalid as:
> there is no xsd:number type.
> src-attribute_group.3 Circular reference to
> attribute group definition 'attGroup'
Changed to xsd:decimal in new contribution
Thanks for your help,
ht
- --
Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
Half-time member of W3C Team
2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFFUhJQkjnJixAXWBoRAh0HAJ9dKVzFU/XFqCWTqbZTHNT88kiOEQCfegcq
dIqrPny5KcIHWckuUGUVfJk=
=lQ3F
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Wednesday, 8 November 2006 17:22:33 UTC