- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2006 15:58:51 +0000
- To: Kasimier Buchcik <kbuchcik@4commerce.de>
- Cc: public-xml-schema-testsuite <public-xml-schema-testsuite@w3.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Kasimier Buchcik writes: > potential errors in the TS xsts-2002-01-16 - msxsdtest: > > Section: complexType > > ctA014, ctA015, ctA023, ctA024 (all schemata) > ctA029, ctC003, ctF003 (all schemata) > ctF006 (schema) All of these have had their expected values changed as you suggested in the forthcoming revised contribution from Microsoft. > A question about ctL021.v: > I currently use the first <schemaTest> information of each > <testGroup> to get hold of the main schema document for the > instances; i.e. I _avoid_ using xsi-driven schema assembling. > The instance document of "ctL021.v" specifies 2 schema > documents via xsi, the second not being mentioned in the > testGroup "ctL021", so there's seems no way around xsi here. > Is this intended? > I would be nice to have the opportunity to _not_ need > xsi-driven schema assembling. The best (for me) would be to > <import> the second schema in the first one, so that there's > always only one main schema. Could we go this way? This has not been changed, and although I sympathise, it seems to me this is actually testing multiple schema locs, and thus really can't be changed in the way you suggest w/o reducing the utility of the test. ht - -- Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh Half-time member of W3C Team 2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440 Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/ [mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFUf67kjnJixAXWBoRAqaqAJwNFy6KxkAR8+sfQDHciJkKKwQb+gCdFNVw ZqyDiqZV3mfto0e61Zvu4wc= =BtXH -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Wednesday, 8 November 2006 15:58:56 UTC