- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2016 12:10:17 -0500
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <8737qmajd2.fsf@nwalsh.com>
Alex Miłowski <alex@milowski.com> writes: > On a different topic, I was thinking that we need to treat inputs and > outputs separately in the syntax when we declare flows and/or steps > (they might just be the same thing and one is just a black box > implementation). > > declare flow > [$in as document()] myfilter($mode as xs:QName, $params as map()) > [$out as document()] To my eyes, the use of [] both before and after the “function signature” is very cluttered. I was trying to put them all in a single []; I simply used a “;” to separate inputs from outputs, though I concede that’s going to lead to weirdness when there are only outputs: [;$out]. > and so we get: > > xproc version = "2.0"; > inputs $source as document-node(); > outputs $result as document-node(); > > [$source] → [$in] λ() [$out] { if (xs:decimal($in/*/@version) < 2.0) > then [$in,"v1schema.xsd"] → > validate-with-xml-schema() ≫ $out > else [$in,"v2schema.xsd"] → > validate-with-xml-schema() ≫ $out } > → [$out,"stylesheet.xsl"] → xslt() Per the previous message: → [port('out'),"stylesheet.xsl"] → xslt() or → [@out,"stylesheet.xsl"] → xslt() I think. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh Lead Engineer MarkLogic Corporation Phone: +1 512 761 6676 www.marklogic.com
Received on Friday, 15 April 2016 17:10:43 UTC