- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 09:47:16 -0500
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <87twvzm1or.fsf@nwalsh.com>
See http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2015/04/29-minutes
[1]W3C
- DRAFT -
XML Processing Model WG
Meeting 270, 29 Apr 2015
[2]Agenda
See also: [3]IRC log
Attendees
Present
Jim, Murray, Alex, Norm, Henry
Regrets
Chair
Norm
Scribe
Norm
Contents
* [4]Topics
1. [5]Accept this agenda?
2. [6]Accept minutes from the previous meetings?
3. [7]Next meeting
4. [8]Review of open action items
5. [9]TPAC
6. [10]Proposal for a p:sort step
7. [11]Proposal for importing functions
8. [12]Any other business?
* [13]Summary of Action Items
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Accept this agenda?
-> [14]http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2015/04/29-agenda
Accepted.
Accept minutes from the previous meetings?
-> [15]http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2015/04/01-minutes
-> [16]http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2015/04/08-minutes
Accepted.
Next meeting
Any regrets for 6 May?
None heard.
Review of open action items
<scribe> No progress reported
TPAC
Norm, Alex are maybes. No one else appears able to go.
<jfuller> yes, its unlikely I could swing it
<jfuller> xmllondon/Edinburgh has used up that slot
Proposal for a p:sort step
-> [17]https://github.com/xproc/extensions/blob/master/steps/sort.md
Norm attempts to summarize.
<ht> +1
<jfuller> +1
<jfuller>
[18]https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-processing-model-wg/2010Nov/0050.html
<ht> I keep being surprised it's not there already
<ht> There must be a reason why not?
Norm: Ok, I hear approval and no objections. We'll stick this in the steps
book.
<scribe> ACTION: A-270-01 Norm to move it into the steps document
[recorded in [19]http://www.w3.org/2015/04/29-xproc-minutes.html#action01]
Proposal for importing functions
-> [20]https://github.com/xproc/extensions/blob/master/steps/sort.md
Norm attempts once again to summarize
<jfuller> [21]https://github.com/xproc/specification/issues/49
<ht> And where can you use them?
<jfuller> saxon-ee though right ?
<Norm> yes, saxon-ee only in my impl.
Norm: You can use them in the XProc XPath Context (but not the XProc Step
XPath context). So on p:with-option but not inside a stylesheet.
<ht> Cool
<jfuller> why not add attribs to existing p:import instead of a whole new
p:import-function element
Norm: I suppose we could.
<jfuller> happier for me
Norm: I guess we could add a type attribute (and others) to p:import
Alex: We have a media type?
Norm: Yes, appendix I
Alex: So we'd default to that?
Norm: Yes.
Alex: And namespace is optional and an error for XProc imports?
Norm: Yep.
Alex: Error or ignored?
Norm: Error, I think, it's resolved statically and if you've used it
incorrectly, you're probably confused.
<jfuller> +1
Proposal: Ask the editor to incorporate this into the draft as an overload
on p:import?
No objections heard
<jfuller> (apologies telcoms issues at the moment)
<scribe> ACTION: A-270-02 Norm to add function import to the language spec
[recorded in [22]http://www.w3.org/2015/04/29-xproc-minutes.html#action02]
Any other business?
Alex: Have we attempted to reconcile progress against the requirements
document?
<jfuller> related - I am confident we can close
[23]https://github.com/xproc/specification/issues/158
<jfuller> (I think we get this with combo of depends-on and enhancements
for logging)
Norm: Not yet
... roughly, we're using github issues to track things
Jim: I think we can close 158
Norm: You opened it, so if you want to close it, I won't object.
Jim: Yes, I think we can.
Adjourned.
Summary of Action Items
[NEW] ACTION: A-270-01 Norm to move it into the steps document [recorded
in [24]http://www.w3.org/2015/04/29-xproc-minutes.html#action01]
[NEW] ACTION: A-270-02 Norm to add function import to the language spec
[recorded in [25]http://www.w3.org/2015/04/29-xproc-minutes.html#action02]
[End of minutes]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Minutes formatted by David Booth's [26]scribe.perl version 1.140 ([27]CVS
log)
$Date: 2015/04/29 14:43:44 $
References
1. http://www.w3.org/
2. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2015/04/29-agenda
3. http://www.w3.org/2015/04/29-xproc-irc
4. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2015/04/29-minutes.html#agenda
5. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2015/04/29-minutes.html#item01
6. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2015/04/29-minutes.html#item02
7. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2015/04/29-minutes.html#item03
8. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2015/04/29-minutes.html#item04
9. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2015/04/29-minutes.html#item05
10. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2015/04/29-minutes.html#item06
11. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2015/04/29-minutes.html#item07
12. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2015/04/29-minutes.html#item08
13. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2015/04/29-minutes.html#ActionSummary
14. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2015/04/29-agenda
15. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2015/04/01-minutes
16. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2015/04/08-minutes
17. https://github.com/xproc/extensions/blob/master/steps/sort.md
18. https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-processing-model-wg/2010Nov/0050.html
19. http://www.w3.org/2015/04/29-xproc-minutes.html#action01]
20. https://github.com/xproc/extensions/blob/master/steps/sort.md
21. https://github.com/xproc/specification/issues/49
22. http://www.w3.org/2015/04/29-xproc-minutes.html#action02]
23. https://github.com/xproc/specification/issues/158
24. http://www.w3.org/2015/04/29-xproc-minutes.html#action01
25. http://www.w3.org/2015/04/29-xproc-minutes.html#action02
26. http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm
27. http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/
Received on Wednesday, 29 April 2015 14:48:02 UTC