- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 09:47:16 -0500
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <87twvzm1or.fsf@nwalsh.com>
See http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2015/04/29-minutes [1]W3C - DRAFT - XML Processing Model WG Meeting 270, 29 Apr 2015 [2]Agenda See also: [3]IRC log Attendees Present Jim, Murray, Alex, Norm, Henry Regrets Chair Norm Scribe Norm Contents * [4]Topics 1. [5]Accept this agenda? 2. [6]Accept minutes from the previous meetings? 3. [7]Next meeting 4. [8]Review of open action items 5. [9]TPAC 6. [10]Proposal for a p:sort step 7. [11]Proposal for importing functions 8. [12]Any other business? * [13]Summary of Action Items -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Accept this agenda? -> [14]http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2015/04/29-agenda Accepted. Accept minutes from the previous meetings? -> [15]http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2015/04/01-minutes -> [16]http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2015/04/08-minutes Accepted. Next meeting Any regrets for 6 May? None heard. Review of open action items <scribe> No progress reported TPAC Norm, Alex are maybes. No one else appears able to go. <jfuller> yes, its unlikely I could swing it <jfuller> xmllondon/Edinburgh has used up that slot Proposal for a p:sort step -> [17]https://github.com/xproc/extensions/blob/master/steps/sort.md Norm attempts to summarize. <ht> +1 <jfuller> +1 <jfuller> [18]https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-processing-model-wg/2010Nov/0050.html <ht> I keep being surprised it's not there already <ht> There must be a reason why not? Norm: Ok, I hear approval and no objections. We'll stick this in the steps book. <scribe> ACTION: A-270-01 Norm to move it into the steps document [recorded in [19]http://www.w3.org/2015/04/29-xproc-minutes.html#action01] Proposal for importing functions -> [20]https://github.com/xproc/extensions/blob/master/steps/sort.md Norm attempts once again to summarize <jfuller> [21]https://github.com/xproc/specification/issues/49 <ht> And where can you use them? <jfuller> saxon-ee though right ? <Norm> yes, saxon-ee only in my impl. Norm: You can use them in the XProc XPath Context (but not the XProc Step XPath context). So on p:with-option but not inside a stylesheet. <ht> Cool <jfuller> why not add attribs to existing p:import instead of a whole new p:import-function element Norm: I suppose we could. <jfuller> happier for me Norm: I guess we could add a type attribute (and others) to p:import Alex: We have a media type? Norm: Yes, appendix I Alex: So we'd default to that? Norm: Yes. Alex: And namespace is optional and an error for XProc imports? Norm: Yep. Alex: Error or ignored? Norm: Error, I think, it's resolved statically and if you've used it incorrectly, you're probably confused. <jfuller> +1 Proposal: Ask the editor to incorporate this into the draft as an overload on p:import? No objections heard <jfuller> (apologies telcoms issues at the moment) <scribe> ACTION: A-270-02 Norm to add function import to the language spec [recorded in [22]http://www.w3.org/2015/04/29-xproc-minutes.html#action02] Any other business? Alex: Have we attempted to reconcile progress against the requirements document? <jfuller> related - I am confident we can close [23]https://github.com/xproc/specification/issues/158 <jfuller> (I think we get this with combo of depends-on and enhancements for logging) Norm: Not yet ... roughly, we're using github issues to track things Jim: I think we can close 158 Norm: You opened it, so if you want to close it, I won't object. Jim: Yes, I think we can. Adjourned. Summary of Action Items [NEW] ACTION: A-270-01 Norm to move it into the steps document [recorded in [24]http://www.w3.org/2015/04/29-xproc-minutes.html#action01] [NEW] ACTION: A-270-02 Norm to add function import to the language spec [recorded in [25]http://www.w3.org/2015/04/29-xproc-minutes.html#action02] [End of minutes] -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Minutes formatted by David Booth's [26]scribe.perl version 1.140 ([27]CVS log) $Date: 2015/04/29 14:43:44 $ References 1. http://www.w3.org/ 2. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2015/04/29-agenda 3. http://www.w3.org/2015/04/29-xproc-irc 4. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2015/04/29-minutes.html#agenda 5. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2015/04/29-minutes.html#item01 6. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2015/04/29-minutes.html#item02 7. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2015/04/29-minutes.html#item03 8. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2015/04/29-minutes.html#item04 9. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2015/04/29-minutes.html#item05 10. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2015/04/29-minutes.html#item06 11. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2015/04/29-minutes.html#item07 12. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2015/04/29-minutes.html#item08 13. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2015/04/29-minutes.html#ActionSummary 14. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2015/04/29-agenda 15. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2015/04/01-minutes 16. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2015/04/08-minutes 17. https://github.com/xproc/extensions/blob/master/steps/sort.md 18. https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-processing-model-wg/2010Nov/0050.html 19. http://www.w3.org/2015/04/29-xproc-minutes.html#action01] 20. https://github.com/xproc/extensions/blob/master/steps/sort.md 21. https://github.com/xproc/specification/issues/49 22. http://www.w3.org/2015/04/29-xproc-minutes.html#action02] 23. https://github.com/xproc/specification/issues/158 24. http://www.w3.org/2015/04/29-xproc-minutes.html#action01 25. http://www.w3.org/2015/04/29-xproc-minutes.html#action02 26. http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm 27. http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/
Received on Wednesday, 29 April 2015 14:48:02 UTC