- From: James Fuller <jim@webcomposite.com>
- Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2014 10:33:05 +0100
- To: "Henry S. Thompson" <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Cc: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>, XProc WG <public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org>
+1, with the ack that we are just pushing the problem to a less common (albeit important) use case. I think the old hack 'make it easy to do the simple and possible to do the hard' applies. J On 6 March 2014 10:12, Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk> wrote: > Norman Walsh writes: > >> On balance, and considering the *enormous* syntactic and semantic >> simplifications it carries with it, I think the Edinburgh proposal is >> "good enough". > > +1 > > ht > -- > Henry S. Thompson, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh > 10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440 > Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk > URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/ > [mail from me _always_ has a .sig like this -- mail without it is forged spam] >
Received on Thursday, 6 March 2014 09:33:33 UTC