- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2013 17:36:40 +0100
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 1 October 2013 16:37:10 UTC
Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.com> writes:
> The drawback with the element (p:parameters) would be that you'd
> only get a string. It would certainly be a convenient way to specify
> multiple parameters within that restriction. It would also, as you
> said, provide a way to pass around parameters as sets.
>
> It is certainly worth exploring.
>
> I assume we'd still retain p:with-param so that non-string values
> can be passed as parameters?
Yes.
Be seeing you,
norm
--
Norman Walsh
Lead Engineer
MarkLogic Corporation
Phone: +1 512 761 6676
www.marklogic.com
Received on Tuesday, 1 October 2013 16:37:10 UTC