- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2013 17:36:40 +0100
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 1 October 2013 16:37:10 UTC
Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.com> writes: > The drawback with the element (p:parameters) would be that you'd > only get a string. It would certainly be a convenient way to specify > multiple parameters within that restriction. It would also, as you > said, provide a way to pass around parameters as sets. > > It is certainly worth exploring. > > I assume we'd still retain p:with-param so that non-string values > can be passed as parameters? Yes. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh Lead Engineer MarkLogic Corporation Phone: +1 512 761 6676 www.marklogic.com
Received on Tuesday, 1 October 2013 16:37:10 UTC