- From: Liam R E Quin <liam@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 21:42:41 -0500
- To: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
On Tue, 2013-11-19 at 09:05 -0600, Norman Walsh wrote: > Hi folks, > > I don't think much has changed in the last week. I haven't heard from > Liam about next steps, we got one comment on our requirements > document, but there's nothing controversial in it. Sorry, what are you waiting for me to do exactly? :-) The China trip was a little overwhelming I'm afraid. The most likely question I think is "do we do xproc 2" and if we do, who will do the work, will anyone join (or stay at) W3C for the work to pay for it, who will use it, how do we tell the world about it... I was hoping we'd chat about such things at an F2F, had it been practical. I'd say, maybe Prague, but I think the XProc charter expires before then or soon after (I'll check when I'm more awake). Liam -- Liam Quin - XML Activity Lead, W3C, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/ Pictures from old books: http://fromoldbooks.org/ Ankh: irc.sorcery.net irc.gnome.org freenode/#xml
Received on Wednesday, 20 November 2013 02:42:44 UTC