- From: James Fuller <jim@webcomposite.com>
- Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 18:17:25 +0100
- To: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
impressive … and yes we should! on next agenda I hope. J On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 5:22 PM, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote: > We should look at addressing these: > > https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/buglist.cgi?product=XML%20Processing%20Model&component=Pipeline%20language&resolution=--- > > and > > https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/buglist.cgi?product=XML%20Processing%20Model&component=Requirements%20and%20use%20cases&resolution=--- > > Be seeing you, > norm > > -- > Norman Walsh > Lead Engineer > MarkLogic Corporation > Phone: +1 512 761 6676 > www.marklogic.com
Received on Monday, 25 February 2013 17:17:53 UTC