- From: Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.com>
- Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2013 15:14:57 -0700
- To: XProc WG <public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CABp3FNKatKC3fWY=K=7a7TEs3tO41feFEjdTFan=2C9kCb9ZJQ@mail.gmail.com>
I mean the restriction should only apply to XSLT 1.0. XSLT 2.0 should be allowed to produce an empty sequence. On Sun, Aug 4, 2013 at 1:36 PM, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote: > Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.com> writes: > > 2. I think we have an issue with XSLT 2.0. According to the XSLT 2.0 > specification, it is > > possible for the primary result document (initial result tree?) to be an > empty sequence if the > > stylesheet only uses xsl:result-document (see [2] and I'm not sure I'm > using the right > > terminology). The problem is that it should be an XProc error if the > output on the result port > > is empty. In this case, all the output ends up on the secondary port > and the result port is an > > empty sequence. We should probably make that only apply to XSLT 1.0. > > I think you mean XSLT 2.0. > > Filed: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=22879 > > Be seeing you, > norm > > -- > Norman Walsh > Lead Engineer > MarkLogic Corporation > Phone: +1 512 761 6676 > www.marklogic.com > -- --Alex Milowski "The excellence of grammar as a guide is proportional to the paucity of the inflexions, i.e. to the degree of analysis effected by the language considered." Bertrand Russell in a footnote of Principles of Mathematics
Received on Monday, 5 August 2013 22:15:24 UTC