- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2012 17:54:19 +0100
- To: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> writes: > At today's XProc telcon, we attempt to return to the question of our > strategic vision for v.next. With our eyes focused on usability and > adoption, consensus seemed to be forming around a short list: > > 1. Fix parameters. > 2. Allow non-XML documents to flow through. > 3. Consider a compact syntax. > 4. Consider allowing implicit declarations. > 5. Groups of new steps (as notes) > > In roughly that order, I think. > > Anyone think other things belong on that list, or want to veto any of > those? That covers my main concerns, IIRC. ht -- Henry S. Thompson, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh 10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440 Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/ [mail from me _always_ has a .sig like this -- mail without it is forged spam]
Received on Thursday, 6 September 2012 16:54:55 UTC