- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2012 11:06:41 -0500
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Received on Thursday, 6 September 2012 16:07:14 UTC
James Fuller <jim@webcomposite.com> writes: > my feeling is 1) and 2) require new spec and the rest dont … 3) and 5) > almost certainly can be managed in a Note. Its highly likely that 4) > is neither and maybe a pure implementation feature requiring nothing > from the WG. Item 4 absolutely requires a spec change, see 4.8 Extension Steps: Extension steps must not be in the XProc namespace and there must be a visible step declaration at the point of use (see Section 3.2, “Scoping of Names”). Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh Lead Engineer MarkLogic Corporation Phone: +1 512 761 6676 www.marklogic.com
Received on Thursday, 6 September 2012 16:07:14 UTC