- From: Davis, Cornelia <cornelia.davis@emc.com>
- Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2012 11:10:41 -0400
- To: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>, "public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org" <public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org>
I think there is a pretty big gap between the importance of the first three and the last two - may be a good dividing line. > -----Original Message----- > From: Norman Walsh [mailto:ndw@nwalsh.com] > Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2012 8:02 AM > To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > Subject: Strategic planning > > At today's XProc telcon, we attempt to return to the question of our > strategic vision for v.next. With our eyes focused on usability and > adoption, consensus seemed to be forming around a short list: > > 1. Fix parameters. > 2. Allow non-XML documents to flow through. > 3. Consider a compact syntax. > 4. Consider allowing implicit declarations. > 5. Groups of new steps (as notes) > > In roughly that order, I think. > > Anyone think other things belong on that list, or want to veto any of > those? > > Be seeing you, > norm > > -- > Norman Walsh > Lead Engineer > MarkLogic Corporation > Phone: +1 512 761 6676 > www.marklogic.com
Received on Thursday, 6 September 2012 15:15:39 UTC