- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 09:30:04 -0500
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <m2lif326qb.fsf@nwalsh.com>
See http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2012/10/18-minutes
[1]W3C
- DRAFT -
XML Processing Model WG
Meeting 222, 18 Oct 2012
[2]Agenda
See also: [3]IRC log
Attendees
Present
Norm, Henry, Alex, Jim, Murray
Regrets
Vojtech, Cornelia
Chair
Norm
Scribe
Norm
Contents
* [4]Topics
1. [5]Accept this agenda?
2. [6]Accept minutes from the previous meeting?
3. [7]Next meeting: telcon 25 Oct? F2F?
4. [8]Review of action items
5. [9]Agenda prep for f2f
6. [10]Any other business?
* [11]Summary of Action Items
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Accept this agenda?
-> [12]http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2012/10/18-agenda
Accepted.
Accept minutes from the previous meeting?
-> [13]http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2012/10/11-minutes
Accepted.
Next meeting: telcon 25 Oct? F2F?
We'll skip 25 Oct and meet at the f2f.
Jim: Will we have good enough wifi to do VOIP at the f2f
Norm: Maybe.
Review of action items
<scribe> No progress reported *sad panda*
Agenda prep for f2f
Norm: Finishing up the processor profiles doc, the new requirements doc,
and any step notes
... We've got a few proposals on the table: fixing parameters and binary
(or non-XML) in pipelines
... I think working through those would be good.
... Any other suggestions?
Jim: If we can leave TPAC with a requirements document that we can work on
by telcon, then I think that would be declaring vicory
... It would be even better if we could publish the zip note.
<scribe> ACTION: Norm to ask cmsmcq to see if he'll be at TPAC and might
meet with us [recorded in
[14]http://www.w3.org/2012/10/18-xproc-minutes.html#action01]
Jim: Can we also look at the test suite again?
Norm: Oh, indeed. And we should run through the public comments.
Jim: There's someone who's made a bunch of comments about zip and unzip. I
need about an hour to review those comments.
-> [15]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xproc-dev/2012Jan/0018.html
Jim: I'll try to update the doc this week.
Henry: Have we given up officially on a compact syntax? I don't have a
brief for it, but I think we need to be happy with that as a decision that
we've made.
Norm: I'm happy to leave that hanging at least through the f2f.
Alex: In the minutes last week, there was something about how we're going
to evolve the steps. A registry for example.
... Separating the steps that we have from the language itself.
<alexmilowski> "JF: Do we need some discussion before we make this more
specific?
<alexmilowski> AM: Yes, I think email discussion is needed"
<alexmilowski> That's what we said..."
Henry: I'm really quite interested in exploring of the idea of not having
a separate spec but having a step registry
... Making it a little bit more like the IANA registry for media types.
Make it possible to publish a document that documents a step and registers
it.
Norm: Sure. The exproc.org site and the wiki were kind of supposed to go
that way but haven't been very successful.
Henry: Successful or not, they don't have any normative force. We'd have
to decide how much normative force we want them to have.
Murray: I'm wondering about if XProc wants to say anything in relation to
micro XML.
Norm: Can you elaborate a little?
Murray: I think we might say that XProc can process micro XML.
Norm: I thought micro XML documents were XML 1.0 documents, but we could
explicitly say it.
Alex: I'm going to try to get my 1.0 requirements/use cases action item
done, that would be something to review.
Any other business?
None heard.
Adjourned.
Summary of Action Items
[NEW] ACTION: Norm to ask cmsmcq to see if he'll be at TPAC and might meet
with us [recorded in
[16]http://www.w3.org/2012/10/18-xproc-minutes.html#action01]
[End of minutes]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Minutes formatted by David Booth's [17]scribe.perl version 1.137 ([18]CVS
log)
$Date: 2012/10/18 14:29:25 $
References
1. http://www.w3.org/
2. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2012/10/18-agenda
3. http://www.w3.org/2012/10/18-xproc-irc
4. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2012/10/18-minutes#agenda
5. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2012/10/18-minutes#item01
6. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2012/10/18-minutes#item02
7. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2012/10/18-minutes#item03
8. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2012/10/18-minutes#item04
9. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2012/10/18-minutes#item05
10. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2012/10/18-minutes#item06
11. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2012/10/18-minutes#ActionSummary
12. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2012/10/18-agenda
13. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2012/10/11-minutes
14. http://www.w3.org/2012/10/18-xproc-minutes.html#action01
15. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xproc-dev/2012Jan/0018.html
16. http://www.w3.org/2012/10/18-xproc-minutes.html#action01
17. http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm
18. http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/
Received on Thursday, 18 October 2012 14:30:34 UTC