- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 09:30:04 -0500
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <m2lif326qb.fsf@nwalsh.com>
See http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2012/10/18-minutes [1]W3C - DRAFT - XML Processing Model WG Meeting 222, 18 Oct 2012 [2]Agenda See also: [3]IRC log Attendees Present Norm, Henry, Alex, Jim, Murray Regrets Vojtech, Cornelia Chair Norm Scribe Norm Contents * [4]Topics 1. [5]Accept this agenda? 2. [6]Accept minutes from the previous meeting? 3. [7]Next meeting: telcon 25 Oct? F2F? 4. [8]Review of action items 5. [9]Agenda prep for f2f 6. [10]Any other business? * [11]Summary of Action Items -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Accept this agenda? -> [12]http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2012/10/18-agenda Accepted. Accept minutes from the previous meeting? -> [13]http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2012/10/11-minutes Accepted. Next meeting: telcon 25 Oct? F2F? We'll skip 25 Oct and meet at the f2f. Jim: Will we have good enough wifi to do VOIP at the f2f Norm: Maybe. Review of action items <scribe> No progress reported *sad panda* Agenda prep for f2f Norm: Finishing up the processor profiles doc, the new requirements doc, and any step notes ... We've got a few proposals on the table: fixing parameters and binary (or non-XML) in pipelines ... I think working through those would be good. ... Any other suggestions? Jim: If we can leave TPAC with a requirements document that we can work on by telcon, then I think that would be declaring vicory ... It would be even better if we could publish the zip note. <scribe> ACTION: Norm to ask cmsmcq to see if he'll be at TPAC and might meet with us [recorded in [14]http://www.w3.org/2012/10/18-xproc-minutes.html#action01] Jim: Can we also look at the test suite again? Norm: Oh, indeed. And we should run through the public comments. Jim: There's someone who's made a bunch of comments about zip and unzip. I need about an hour to review those comments. -> [15]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xproc-dev/2012Jan/0018.html Jim: I'll try to update the doc this week. Henry: Have we given up officially on a compact syntax? I don't have a brief for it, but I think we need to be happy with that as a decision that we've made. Norm: I'm happy to leave that hanging at least through the f2f. Alex: In the minutes last week, there was something about how we're going to evolve the steps. A registry for example. ... Separating the steps that we have from the language itself. <alexmilowski> "JF: Do we need some discussion before we make this more specific? <alexmilowski> AM: Yes, I think email discussion is needed" <alexmilowski> That's what we said..." Henry: I'm really quite interested in exploring of the idea of not having a separate spec but having a step registry ... Making it a little bit more like the IANA registry for media types. Make it possible to publish a document that documents a step and registers it. Norm: Sure. The exproc.org site and the wiki were kind of supposed to go that way but haven't been very successful. Henry: Successful or not, they don't have any normative force. We'd have to decide how much normative force we want them to have. Murray: I'm wondering about if XProc wants to say anything in relation to micro XML. Norm: Can you elaborate a little? Murray: I think we might say that XProc can process micro XML. Norm: I thought micro XML documents were XML 1.0 documents, but we could explicitly say it. Alex: I'm going to try to get my 1.0 requirements/use cases action item done, that would be something to review. Any other business? None heard. Adjourned. Summary of Action Items [NEW] ACTION: Norm to ask cmsmcq to see if he'll be at TPAC and might meet with us [recorded in [16]http://www.w3.org/2012/10/18-xproc-minutes.html#action01] [End of minutes] -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Minutes formatted by David Booth's [17]scribe.perl version 1.137 ([18]CVS log) $Date: 2012/10/18 14:29:25 $ References 1. http://www.w3.org/ 2. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2012/10/18-agenda 3. http://www.w3.org/2012/10/18-xproc-irc 4. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2012/10/18-minutes#agenda 5. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2012/10/18-minutes#item01 6. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2012/10/18-minutes#item02 7. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2012/10/18-minutes#item03 8. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2012/10/18-minutes#item04 9. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2012/10/18-minutes#item05 10. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2012/10/18-minutes#item06 11. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2012/10/18-minutes#ActionSummary 12. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2012/10/18-agenda 13. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2012/10/11-minutes 14. http://www.w3.org/2012/10/18-xproc-minutes.html#action01 15. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xproc-dev/2012Jan/0018.html 16. http://www.w3.org/2012/10/18-xproc-minutes.html#action01 17. http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm 18. http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/
Received on Thursday, 18 October 2012 14:30:34 UTC