- From: James Fuller <jim@webcomposite.com>
- Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 15:37:45 +0200
- To: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 3:34 PM, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote: > James Fuller <jim@webcomposite.com> writes: >> I have committed a very rough and early version of Requirements doc. >> >> http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/docs/requirements-v2-jim.xml >> >> For todays review. > > I think as a requirement 4.1 should read "Make parameters easier to > use/understand"; my proposal is a solution not a requiremnt. > > What's the requirement in 4.6? I'm not objecting, I'd just like to > see it expressed as a requirement. thx for the suggestion, the plan is to flesh out each area … what we have at the moment were placeholders for last weeks meeting. J
Received on Thursday, 18 October 2012 13:38:14 UTC