- From: James Fuller <jim@webcomposite.com>
- Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2012 13:18:40 +0200
- To: XProc WG <public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org>
After some reflection, I have flipped flopped on my assertion that we may need to consider implicit decl for v2.0 and will not include them (unless others feel strongly the other way) in v2.0 doc. The primary scenario I am interested in is allowing developers to download step decl and then immediately use them in their pipelines w/o the need for tedious import of decl. On testing with xprocxq, I now think there is no need to add this as a requirement for v2.0 as its achievable with an extension attribute and some pipeline rewriting (or I can even imagine an extension-step 'step loader'). Jim Fuller
Received on Thursday, 11 October 2012 11:19:06 UTC