- From: Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.com>
- Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2012 08:49:14 -0700
- To: XProc WG <public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org>
I have been thinking about our previous requirements document. I think we should refactor our requirements to a new set that make sense going forward. We have a different group of people than where we started. I think we can cover what we accomplished in 1.0 with different wording of requirements without losing their value. One way forward is to publish a simple note that includes the "solutions" that we've already provided for the 1.0 requirements. Then we can reference that in a new requirements document. Meanwhile, we can refactor the 1.0 requirements into a more cohesive set. I personally think that would be easier overall but make some editing work now. -- --Alex Milowski "The excellence of grammar as a guide is proportional to the paucity of the inflexions, i.e. to the degree of analysis effected by the language considered." Bertrand Russell in a footnote of Principles of Mathematics
Received on Monday, 1 October 2012 15:49:49 UTC