- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2012 11:57:46 -0500
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Received on Thursday, 5 January 2012 17:00:46 UTC
"Henry S. Thompson" <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk> writes: > More on p:uri-scope -- the idea is that there is an implicit > p:uri-scope around the entire top-level pipeline, and that every > p:uri-scope acts as a scope for an *available documents* collection, > mapping from URIs to documents, which is initially empty. Any URI > resolution action works with respect to its nearest (lexically) > surrounding uri-scope, and either uses what it finds there, or does a > 'fetch' and caches the result there. Does a nested scope inherit from its ancestor scopes, or explicitly ignore them? I expect that users need to be able to choose. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh Lead Engineer MarkLogic Corporation Phone: +1 413 624 6676 www.marklogic.com
Received on Thursday, 5 January 2012 17:00:46 UTC