- From: Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.com>
- Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2012 12:00:53 -0800
- To: XProc WG <public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org>
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 8:30 AM, Innovimax W3C <innovimax+w3c@gmail.com> wrote: > I can't see how p:try/p:catch would make it less complex... > My initial thought was that we could state all the type pre-conditions and they then catch only executes when the typing fails. This would be a lot less complicated that trying to write all that into a test expression. Of course, not everything can be expressed as a simple type cast check. For example, range value checks would still need to be expressions. -- --Alex Milowski "The excellence of grammar as a guide is proportional to the paucity of the inflexions, i.e. to the degree of analysis effected by the language considered." Bertrand Russell in a footnote of Principles of Mathematics
Received on Tuesday, 7 February 2012 20:05:19 UTC