- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2012 09:08:49 -0800
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <m2txs08lzy.fsf@nwalsh.com>
James Fuller <jim@webcomposite.com> writes: > I remember dimly of us conversing to retain the p:with-param (versus > lets say overloading p:with-option) but any chance of re-summarizing > … its probably related to something to do with the step signature but > as we have parameter="true" on p:option was wondering if there is a > further opportunity to simplify things. I think we decided to retain with-param so that this would still be OK: <p:xslt> ... <p:with-param name="page-size" select="'A4'"/> <p:with-param name="output-format" select="'pdf'"/> </p:xslt> We could do away with with-param, but then you'd have to write <p:xslt> ... <p:with-option name="parameters" select="map{'page-size':='A4', 'output-format':='pdf'}"/> </p:xslt> which seems rather burdensome. There are some subtleties related to mixing the two forms, and I don't recall exactly how we resolved those, or if we got down to that level of detail. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh Lead Engineer MarkLogic Corporation Phone: +1 512 761 6676 www.marklogic.com
Received on Wednesday, 5 December 2012 17:09:23 UTC