- From: Murray Maloney <muzmo@me.com>
- Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 10:34:20 -0700
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
- Cc: Murray Maloney <muzmo@me.com>
Folks (especially Norm and Alex), I just discovered http://exproc.org/proposed/ I see that a lot of writing work has been done to justify many of the proposed steps that are listed in the requirements WD. My question is: Should I incorporate that material in the WD or simply point at it? On 2012-04-12, at 7:32 AM, James Fuller wrote: > here is an example pipeline that satisfies this use case. > > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> > <p:declare-step > xmlns:c="http://www.w3.org/ns/xproc-step" > xmlns:p="http://www.w3.org/ns/xproc" > xmlns:cx="http://xmlcalabash.com/ns/extensions" > version="1.0" > exclude-inline-prefixes="cx c p"> > <p:input port="source"> > <p:inline><test/> > </p:inline> > </p:input> > <p:output port="result"/> > <p:exec command="/bin/cat" result-is-xml="true"/> > </p:declare-step> > > will generate > > <c:result xmlns:c="http://www.w3.org/ns/xproc-step"><test/></c:result> > > Jim Fuller >
Received on Friday, 13 April 2012 17:34:59 UTC